IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1197-d208690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Building Environment on Residential Satisfaction: A Case Study of Ningbo

Author

Listed:
  • Yanhong Yin

    (Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, 169 Qixinnan Road, Meishan, Beilun District, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Yuanwen He

    (Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, 169 Qixinnan Road, Meishan, Beilun District, Ningbo 315211, China
    National Traffic Management Engineering & Technology Research Centre Ningbo University Sub-center in China,169 Qixinnan Road, Meishan, Beilun District, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Lei Zhang

    (Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, 169 Qixinnan Road, Meishan, Beilun District, Ningbo 315211, China
    Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Centre for Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, 169 Qixinnan Road, Meishan, Beilun District, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Dan Zhao

    (Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, 169 Qixinnan Road, Meishan, Beilun District, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

Population distribution has a huge influence on the development of port economic circle (PEC) in Ningbo. Residential satisfaction is one of key elements that determine housing location choice and, thus, the success of population distribution policy. To provide suggestions for the development of PEC, this study conducted a survey to investigate residential satisfaction and related factors in 11 port communities, which are located in the harbour area of Beilun, Zhenhai and Meishan in Ningbo. A total of 403 valid samples were collected through face-to-face interviews. The Likert scale was used to express satisfaction levels, with the highest level of 5 and the lowest level of 1. The survey data indicate that the mean value of residential satisfaction is 3.41, 3.40 and 3.49 in Beilun, Zhenhai and Meishan, respectively. Middle level residential satisfaction is noted in the port communities of Ningbo. A linear regression was performed to analyse the relationship between residential satisfaction and influence factors in terms of the demographic and socioeconomic features of the respondents and attributes of the house and neighbourhood. The results of the regression analysis show that household income, design of housing, type of community, population density and distance to the district commercial centre are the most influential factors of residential satisfaction. The findings suggest making regulations to enforce the design standards of new buildings. Moreover, measures to improve the accessibility and quality of public facilities and services in the communities should be encouraged to increase the attractiveness of neighbourhoods in the port area. Promoting land use with mixed commercial and residential functions is also suggested for the development of PEC.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanhong Yin & Yuanwen He & Lei Zhang & Dan Zhao, 2019. "Impact of Building Environment on Residential Satisfaction: A Case Study of Ningbo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1197-:d:208690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul G. Lewis & Mark Baldassare, 2010. "The Complexity of Public Attitudes Toward Compact Development," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 219-237, April.
    2. Yin, Yanhong & Aikawa, Kohei & Mizokami, Shoshi, 2016. "Effect of housing relocation subsidy policy on energy consumption: A simulation case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 291-302.
    3. Yin, Yanhong & Mizokami, Shoshi & Aikawa, Kohei, 2015. "Compact development and energy consumption: Scenario analysis of urban structures based on behavior simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 449-457.
    4. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2012. "Are compact cities environmentally friendly?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 123-136.
    5. Qidong Huang & Jiajun Xu & Hua Qin & Xinyu Gao, 2018. "Understanding Land Use and Rural Development in the National Scheme of Village Relocation and Urbanization in China: A Case Study of Two Villages in Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra R. & Hensher, David A., 2009. "Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 729-748, August.
    7. Yin, Yanhong & Mizokami, Shoshi & Maruyama, Takuya, 2013. "An analysis of the influence of urban form on energy consumption by individual consumption behaviors from a microeconomic viewpoint," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 909-919.
    8. Alison Parkes & Ade Kearns & Rowland Atkinson, 2002. "What Makes People Dissatisfied with their Neighbourhoods?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(13), pages 2413-2438, December.
    9. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2012. "Are compact cities environmentally friendly?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 123-136.
    10. Lee, Sungwon & Lee, Bumsoo, 2014. "The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the U.S. household sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 534-549.
    11. Carl Gaigné & Stéphane Riou & Jacques-François Thisse, 2012. "Are Compact Cities Environmentally (and Socially) Desirable ?," Cahiers de recherche CREATE 2012-4, CREATE.
    12. Felix Haifeng Liao & Steven Farber & Reid Ewing, 2015. "Compact development and preference heterogeneity in residential location choice behaviour: A latent class analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(2), pages 314-337, February.
    13. Elizabeth C. Delmelle & Yuhong Zhou & Jean-Claude Thill, 2014. "Densification without Growth Management? Evidence from Local Land Development and Housing Trends in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xue Bai & Zhaoyu Xie & Bart Julien Dewancker, 2022. "Exploring the Factors Affecting User Satisfaction in Poverty Alleviation Relocation Housing for Minorities through Post-Occupancy Evaluation: A Case Study of Pu’er," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Qi Chen & Yibo Yan & Xu Zhang & Jian Chen, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Built Environment Elements on Satisfaction with Residency Whilst Considering Spatial Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Zhenmin Yuan & Guodong Ni & Linxiu Wang & Yaning Qiao & Chengshuang Sun & Na Xu & Wenshun Wang, 2020. "Research on the Barrier Analysis and Strength Measurement of a Prefabricated Building Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Yanhong & Aikawa, Kohei & Mizokami, Shoshi, 2016. "Effect of housing relocation subsidy policy on energy consumption: A simulation case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 291-302.
    2. Kahn, Matthew E. & Walsh, Randall, 2015. "Cities and the Environment," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 405-465, Elsevier.
    3. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Carl Gaigné & Jacques-François Thisse, 2013. "New Economic Geography and the City," Working Papers SMART 13-02, INRAE UMR SMART.
    5. Castells-Quintana, David & Dienesch, Elisa & Krause, Melanie, 2021. "Air pollution in an urban world: A global view on density, cities and emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Lewandowska Aleksandra & Piasecki Adam, 2019. "Selected aspects of water and sewage management in Poland in the context of sustainable urban development," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 45(45), pages 149-157, September.
    7. Denant-Boemont, Laurent & Gaigné, Carl & Gaté, Romain, 2018. "Urban spatial structure, transport-related emissions and welfare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 29-45.
    8. Stéphane De Cara & Anne Fournier & Carl Gaigné, 2011. "Feeding the cities and greenhouse gas emissions: a new economic geography approach," Working Papers 1109, Chaire Economie du climat.
    9. Xinyue Hu & Han Yan & Deng Wang & Zhuoqun Zhao & Guoqin Zhang & Tao Lin & Hong Ye, 2020. "A Promotional Construction Approach for an Urban Three-Dimensional Compactness Model—Law-of-Gravitation-Based," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-10, August.
    10. Rémy Le Boennec & Florent Sari, 2015. "Subcenters, mode choice and transport policies: evidence form Nantes [Nouvelles centralités, choix modal et politiques de déplacements : le cas nantais]," Post-Print hal-01657242, HAL.
    11. Rémy Le Boennec & Sterenn Lucas, 2020. "Does a positive density perception increase the probability of living in the ideal housing type? Evidence from the Loire-Atlantique Département in France," Working Papers hal-02441513, HAL.
    12. Wu, Jianxin & Xu, Hui & Tang, Kai, 2021. "Industrial agglomeration, CO2 emissions and regional development programs: A decomposition analysis based on 286 Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Urban land use and transportation planning for climate change mitigation: A theoretical framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 604-616.
    14. Rainald Borck & Takatoshi Tabuchi, 2019. "Pollution and city size: can cities be too small?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 995-1020.
    15. Bingqing Li & Zhanqi Wang & Ji Chai, 2022. "Verifying the Synthesized Effects of Intensive Urban Land Use on Quality of Life, Ecology, and Urban-Land-Use Scale in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Fan, Pengda & Qian, Xuepeng & Wang, Jian, 2023. "Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Poruschi, Lavinia & Ambrey, Christopher L., 2018. "Densification, what does it mean for fuel poverty and energy justice? An empirical analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 208-217.
    18. Ma, Jun & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2016. "Estimation of the building energy use intensity in the urban scale by integrating GIS and big data technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 182-192.
    19. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Youcef MECHOUAR & V Hovelaque & C Gaigné, 2021. "Effect of raw material substitution on the facility location decision under a carbon tax policy," Post-Print hal-04155066, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1197-:d:208690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.