IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1129-d207849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensuring the Safety Sustainability of Large UAS: Learning from the Maintenance Risk Dynamics of USAF MQ-1 Predator Fleet in Last Two Decades

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Lu

    (Department of Automation, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Ying Qian

    (Department of Information Systems, School of Management, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Huayan Huangfu

    (Department of Automation, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Shuguang Zhang

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Shan Fu

    (Department of Automation, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

The mishap statistics of large military unmanned aerial systems (UAS) reveal that human errors and organizational flaws pose great threats to their operation safety, especially considering the future application of derived civilian types. Moreover, maintenance accidents due to human factors have reached a significant level, but have received little attention in the existing research. To ensure the safety and sustainability of large UAS, we propose a system dynamics approach to model the maintenance risk mechanisms involving organizational, human, and technical factors, which made a breakthrough in the traditional event-chain static analysis method. Using the United States Air Force (USAF) MQ-1 Predator fleet case, the derived time-domain simulation represented the risk evolution process of the past two decades and verified the rationality of the proposed model. It was identified that the effects of maintainer human factors on the accident rate exceeded those of the technical systems in a long-term view, even though the technical reliability improvements had obvious initial effects on risk reduction. The characteristics of maintainer errors should be considered in system and maintenance procedure design to prevent them in a proactive way. It is also shown that the approach-derived SD model can be developed into a semi-quantitative decision-making support tool for improving the safety of large UAS in a risk-based view of airworthiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Lu & Ying Qian & Huayan Huangfu & Shuguang Zhang & Shan Fu, 2019. "Ensuring the Safety Sustainability of Large UAS: Learning from the Maintenance Risk Dynamics of USAF MQ-1 Predator Fleet in Last Two Decades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1129-:d:207849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiali Yu & Peng Yang & Kai Zhang & Faping Wang & Lixin Miao, 2018. "Evaluating the Effect of Policies and the Development of Charging Infrastructure on Electric Vehicle Diffusion in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Ricardo Luiz Fernandes Bella & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Fernando Toledo Ferraz & Marlene Jesus Soares Bezerra, 2018. "Workplace Spirituality: Sustainable Work Experience from a Human Factors Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Tuqiang Zhou & Junyi Zhang & Dashzeveg Baasansuren, 2018. "A Hybrid HFACS-BN Model for Analysis of Mongolian Aviation Professionals’ Awareness of Human Factors Related to Aviation Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inmaculada Silla & Francisco J. Gracia & José M. Peiró, 2020. "Upward Voice: Participative Decision Making, Trust in Leadership and Safety Climate Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Hongqi Wang & Jing Huang, 2018. "Exploring Driving Forces of Sustainable Development of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Li, Jingjing & Nian, Victor & Jiao, Jianling, 2022. "Diffusion and benefits evaluation of electric vehicles under policy interventions based on a multiagent system dynamics model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    5. Mohammad Nurul Alam & Juman Iqbal & Hammad S. Alotaibi & Nhat Tan Nguyen & Norazuwa Mat & Ali Alsiehemy, 2023. "Does Workplace Spirituality Foster Employee Ambidexterity? Evidence from IT Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Raysa Rocha & Paulo Pinheiro, 2021. "Business Education: Filling the Gaps in the Leader’s Awareness Concerning Organizational Phronesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Cheng Wang & Zhou Gao & Peng Yang & Zhenpo Wang & Zhiheng Li, 2021. "Electric Vehicle Charging Facility Planning Based on Flow Demand—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Li, Jue & Li, Heng & Wang, Fan & Cheng, Andy S.K. & Yang, Xincong & Wang, Hongwei, 2021. "Proactive analysis of construction equipment operators’ hazard perception error based on cognitive modeling and a dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Tuqiang Zhou & Junyi Zhang & Dashzeveg Baasansuren, 2018. "A Hybrid HFACS-BN Model for Analysis of Mongolian Aviation Professionals’ Awareness of Human Factors Related to Aviation Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Peng He & Ruishan Sun, 2022. "Research on Cross-Correlation, Co-Integration, and Causality Relationship between Civil Aviation Incident and Airline Capacity in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Ziwen Ling & Christopher R. Cherry & Yi Wen, 2021. "Determining the Factors That Influence Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Stated Preference Survey Study in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Steve J. Bickley & Benno Torgler, 2020. "A Systematic Approach to Safety Incidents in Public Health – Applying the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System to COVID-19," CREMA Working Paper Series 2020-13, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    13. Nur Ayeesha Qisteena Muzir & Md. Rayid Hasan Mojumder & Md. Hasanuzzaman & Jeyraj Selvaraj, 2022. "Challenges of Electric Vehicles and Their Prospects in Malaysia: A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-40, July.
    14. Lin Ma & Yuefan Zhai & Tian Wu, 2019. "Operating Charging Infrastructure in China to Achieve Sustainable Transportation: The Choice between Company-Owned and Franchised Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Unnati Tuladhar & Nuttaya Yuangyai & Theerakamol Pengsakul & Saroj Gyawali, 2023. "The Determination of Willingness to Pay for Electrical Vehicles: A Literature Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 425-431, September.
    16. Yuping Lin & Kai Zhang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Lixin Miao, 2019. "Charging Network Planning for Electric Bus Cities: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    17. Jaroslava Kubátová & Ondřej Kročil, 2020. "The Potential of Impact and Integral Investing for Sustainable Social Development and the Role of Academia in Their Dissemination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Lin Ma & Manhua Wu & Xiujuan Tian & Guanheng Zheng & Qinchuan Du & Tian Wu, 2019. "China’s Provincial Vehicle Ownership Forecast and Analysis of the Causes Influencing the Trend," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Rodrigo Gris de Souza & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas, 2020. "Model Proposal for Diagnosis and Integration of Industry 4.0 Concepts in Production Engineering Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Santos, Georgina & Rembalski, Sebastian, 2021. "Do electric vehicles need subsidies in the UK?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1129-:d:207849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.