IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p750-d202387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observing the Impact of WWF Earth Hour on Urban Light Pollution: A Case Study in Berlin 2018 Using Differential Photometry

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Jechow

    (Leibniz Instute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany
    GFZ German Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany)

Abstract

Earth Hour is one of the most successful coordinated mass efforts worldwide to raise awareness of environmental issues, with excessive energy consumption being one driver of climate change. The campaign, first organized by the World Wildlife Fund in Australia in 2007, has grown across borders and cultures and was celebrated in 188 countries in 2018. It calls for voluntarily reduction of electricity consumption for a single hour of one day each year. Switching off non-essential electric lights is a central theme and resulted in 17,900 landmarks going dark in 2018. This switch-off of lights during Earth Hour also leads to reduction of light pollution for this specific period. In principle, Earth Hour allows the study of light pollution and the linkage to electricity consumption of lighting. However, quantitative analysis of the impact of Earth Hour on light pollution (and electricity consumption) are sparse, with only a few studies published showing no clear impact or the reverse, suffering from residual twilight and unstable weather conditions. In this work, light pollution measurements during Earth Hour 2018 in an urban park (Tiergarten) in Berlin, Germany, are reported. A novel light measurement method using differential photometry with calibrated digital cameras enables tracking of the switching off and switching back on of the lights of Berlin’s iconic Brandenburg Gate and the buildings of Potsdamer Platz adjacent to the park. Light pollution reduction during the event was measurable, despite the presence of moonlight. Strategies for future work on light pollution using such events are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Jechow, 2019. "Observing the Impact of WWF Earth Hour on Urban Light Pollution: A Case Study in Berlin 2018 Using Differential Photometry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:750-:d:202387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Edensor, 2015. "The gloomy city: Rethinking the relationship between light and dark," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(3), pages 422-438, February.
    2. Eva Knop & Leana Zoller & Remo Ryser & Christopher Gerpe & Maurin Hörler & Colin Fontaine, 2017. "Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination," Nature, Nature, vol. 548(7666), pages 206-209, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hoi-Wing Chan & Vivien Pong & Kim-Pong Tam, 2020. "Explaining participation in Earth Hour: the identity perspective and the theory of planned behavior," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 309-325, February.
    2. Andreas Papalambrou & Lambros T. Doulos, 2019. "Identifying, Examining, and Planning Areas Protected from Light Pollution. The Case Study of Planning the First National Dark Sky Park in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Salvador Bará & Raul C. Lima & Jaime Zamorano, 2019. "Monitoring Long-Term Trends in the Anthropogenic Night Sky Brightness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Kountouris, Yiannis, 2022. "Awareness days and environmental attitudes: The case of the “Earth Hour”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Karolina M. Zielińska-Dabkowska & Kyra Xavia & Katarzyna Bobkowska, 2020. "Assessment of Citizens’ Actions against Light Pollution with Guidelines for Future Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-32, June.
    6. Tanya Kaur Bedi & Kshama Puntambekar & Sonal Singh, 2021. "Light pollution in India: appraisal of artificial night sky brightness of cities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18582-18597, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andy Deprato & Himasha Rao & Hannah Durrington & Robert Maidstone & Ana Adan & Jose Francisco Navarro & Anna Palomar-Cros & Barbara N. Harding & Prasun Haldar & Saibal Moitra & Tanusree Moitra & Lyle , 2022. "The Influence of Artificial Light at Night on Asthma and Allergy, Mental Health, and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Jens Schirmel, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Turns Life-Science Students into “Citizen Scientists”: Data Indicate Multiple Negative Effects of Urbanization on Biota," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Alejandro Martínez-Martín & Adrián Bocho-Roas & Diego Carmona-Fernández & Manuel Calderón-Godoy & Miguel Ángel Jaramillo-Morán & Juan Félix González, 2023. "Influence of Illumination Parameters on Night Sky Observation in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Roy H. A. van Grunsven & Julia Becker & Stephanie Peter & Stefan Heller & Franz Hölker, 2019. "Long-Term Comparison of Attraction of Flying Insects to Streetlights after the Transition from Traditional Light Sources to Light-Emitting Diodes in Urban and Peri-Urban Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Steven M. Vamosi, 2023. "Species and Areas Under Protection: Challenges and Opportunities for the Canadian Northern Corridor," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(18), June.
    6. Maja Grubisic & Abraham Haim & Pramod Bhusal & Davide M. Dominoni & Katharina M. A. Gabriel & Andreas Jechow & Franziska Kupprat & Amit Lerner & Paul Marchant & William Riley & Katarina Stebelova & Ro, 2019. "Light Pollution, Circadian Photoreception, and Melatonin in Vertebrates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-51, November.
    7. Sibylle Schroer & Benedikt John Huggins & Clementine Azam & Franz Hölker, 2020. "Working with Inadequate Tools: Legislative Shortcomings in Protection against Ecological Effects of Artificial Light at Night," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-38, March.
    8. Benyan Jiang & Shan Li & Jianjun Li & Yuli Zhang & Zihao Zheng, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Sensitive Distance Identification of Light Pollution in Protected Areas Based on Muti-Source Data: A Case Study of Guangdong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Tanja M. Straka & Pia E. Lentini & Linda F. Lumsden & Sascha Buchholz & Brendan A. Wintle & Rodney van der Ree, 2020. "Clean and Green Urban Water Bodies Benefit Nocturnal Flying Insects and Their Predators, Insectivorous Bats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Annika K. Jägerbrand & Constantinos A. Bouroussis, 2021. "Ecological Impact of Artificial Light at Night: Effective Strategies and Measures to Deal with Protected Species and Habitats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Zenia Kavassilas & Marion Mittmannsgruber & Edith Gruber & Johann G. Zaller, 2024. "Artificial Light at Night Reduces the Surface Activity of Earthworms, Increases the Growth of a Cover Crop and Reduces Water Leaching," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Ruixi Su & Yi Chen & Zibin Huang, 2024. "Evaluating Light Pollution: An IES Model for Intervention Strategies," Environment and Pollution, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, March.
    13. Beate Apfelbeck & Christine Jakoby & Maximilian Hanusch & Emanuel Boas Steffani & Thomas E. Hauck & Wolfgang W. Weisser, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Choosing Target Species for Wildlife-Inclusive Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    light pollution; earth hour;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:750-:d:202387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.