IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p614-d200550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Drivers and Performance of Environmental Practices in the Chinese Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Li

    (School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Ronggui Ding

    (School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Tao Sun

    (School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

Abstract

With the global concern of environmental protection and sustainability, construction firms are required to develop and implement environmental practices (EP) to mitigate the negative impacts of project activities on the environment. This paper attempts to explore two potential drivers (i.e., government regulations and project team’s knowledge and skills) and performance outcomes (i.e., environmental performance and organizational performance) when the firm implementing EP in construction projects. A survey-based research design was developed to measure the drivers, EP implementation, and performance and to collect data in the Chinese construction industry. Structural equation modelling was used to test the hypothesized relationships. The results indicate that a project team’s knowledge and skills, rather than government regulations, are the key driving factors for the implementation of EP in construction projects. EP implementation is proved to have a positive impact on both environmental and organizational performance. This study provides empirical evidence for project environmental management research and offers managerial insights on how to promote EP in the construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Li & Ronggui Ding & Tao Sun, 2019. "The Drivers and Performance of Environmental Practices in the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:614-:d:200550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Bart Bossink, 2002. "A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 633-642.
    3. Guangdong Wu & Guofeng Qiang & Jian Zuo & Xianbo Zhao & Ruidong Chang, 2018. "What are the Key Indicators of Mega Sustainable Construction Projects? —A Stakeholder-Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Bossink, B.A.G., 2002. "A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction," Serie Research Memoranda 0037, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Horváthová, Eva, 2010. "Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 52-59, November.
    6. Jörg Henseler & Marko Sarstedt, 2013. "Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 565-580, April.
    7. Zhang, Xiaoling & Shen, Liyin & Zhang, Lei, 2013. "Life cycle assessment of the air emissions during building construction process: A case study in Hong Kong," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 160-169.
    8. Bon‐Gang Hwang & Jac See Tan, 2012. "Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(5), pages 335-349, September.
    9. Xiaodong Yang & Jiayu Zhang & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Factors Affecting Green Residential Building Development: Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Antonio Paula Pinheiro & Daniel Jugend & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Hengky Latan, 2022. "Circular economy‐based new products and company performance: The role of stakeholders and Industry 4.0 technologies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 483-499, January.
    2. Mehfooz Ullah & Muhammad Waris Ali Khan & Lee Chia Kuang & Ammar Hussain & Faisal Rana & Asadullah Khan & Mirza Rizwan Sajid, 2020. "A Structural Model for the Antecedents of Sustainable Project Management in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Ahsan Waqar & Idris Othman & Juan Carlos Pomares, 2023. "Impact of 3D Printing on the Overall Project Success of Residential Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modelling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Linlin Xie & Mian Huang & Bo Xia & Martin Skitmore, 2022. "Megaproject Environmentally Responsible Behavior in China: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Yanfang Sun & Haiyan Xie & Xirong Niu, 2019. "Characteristics of Cyclical Fluctuations in the Development of the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    2. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    3. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    4. Santanu Mandal & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2016. "Tourism supply chain agility: an empirical examination using resource-based view," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 151-173.
    5. Bossink, B.A.G., 2003. "Coinnovation research : manual for experiential research into organizational coinnovation," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Dabija, Dan-Cristian & Brătianu, Constantin & Dominici, Gandolfo & Vătămănescu, Elena-Mădălina, 2024. "Unveiling e-learning and knowledge sharing during the pandemic: From expert skills perception to student satisfaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Andreas Pfnür & Benjamin Wagner, 2020. "Transformation of the real estate and construction industry: empirical findings from Germany," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(7), pages 975-1019, August.
    8. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Milad Abdelnabi Salem & Fekri Shawtari & Hafezali Bin Iqbal Hussain & Mohd Farid Shamsudin, 2020. "Environmental technology and a multiple approach of competitiveness," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Mirchandani, Dinesh A. & Lederer, Albert L., 2014. "The impact of core and infrastructure business activities on information systems planning and effectiveness," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 622-633.
    11. Juan Manuel Ramon-Jeronimo & Raquel Florez-Lopez & Pedro Araujo-Pinzon, 2019. "Resource-Based View and SMEs Performance Exporting through Foreign Intermediaries: The Mediating Effect of Management Controls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Martin, Jillian & Mortimer, Gary & Andrews, Lynda, 2015. "Re-examining online customer experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 81-95.
    13. Shafique, Muhammad Noman & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling, 2024. "Roles of top management support and compatibility in big data predictive analytics for supply chain collaboration and supply chain performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Sameh Fayyad, 2023. "Green Management and Sustainable Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Hospitality Businesses: Moderating the Role of an Employee’s Pro-Environmental Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Shatha M. Obeidat & Anas A. Al Bakri & Said Elbanna, 2020. "Leveraging “Green” Human Resource Practices to Enable Environmental and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Qatari Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 371-388, June.
    16. Robert Osei-Kyei & Albert P. C. Chan & Yao Yu & Chuan Chen & Yongjian Ke & Bashir Tijani, 2019. "Social Responsibility Initiatives for Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Comparative Study between China and Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Veronica Câmpian & Anna-Rebeka Pop & Raluca Bãbu?, 2022. "Generating loyalty towards fast fashion stores: a cross-generational approach based on store attributes and socio-environmental responsibility," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 891-934, September.
    18. Gelhard, Carsten & von Delft, Stephan, 2016. "The role of organizational capabilities in achieving superior sustainability performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4632-4642.
    19. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    20. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:614-:d:200550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.