IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6669-d290792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extracting Knowledge from Big Data for Sustainability: A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Raghu Garg

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala 147002, India)

  • Himanshu Aggarwal

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala 147002, India)

  • Piera Centobelli

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Roberto Cerchione

    (Department of Engineering, Centro Direzionale di Napoli, Isola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

At present, due to the unavailability of natural resources, society should take the maximum advantage of data, information, and knowledge to achieve sustainability goals. In today’s world condition, the existence of humans is not possible without the essential proliferation of plants. In the photosynthesis procedure, plants use solar energy to convert into chemical energy. This process is responsible for all life on earth, and the main controlling factor for proper plant growth is soil since it holds water, air, and all essential nutrients of plant nourishment. Though, due to overexposure, soil gets despoiled, so fertilizer is an essential component to hold the soil quality. In that regard, soil analysis is a suitable method to determine soil quality. Soil analysis examines the soil in laboratories and generates reports of unorganized and insignificant data. In this study, different big data analysis machine learning methods are used to extracting knowledge from data to find out fertilizer recommendation classes on behalf of present soil nutrition composition. For this experiment, soil analysis reports are collected from the Tata soil and water testing center. In this paper, Mahoot library is used for analysis of stochastic gradient descent (SGD), artificial neural network (ANN) performance on Hadoop environment. For better performance evaluation, we also used single machine experiments for random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbors K-NN, regression tree (RT), support vector machine (SVM) using polynomial function, SVM using radial basis function (RBF) methods. Detailed experimental analysis was carried out using overall accuracy, AUC–ROC (receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and area under the ROC curve (AUC)) curve, mean absolute prediction error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R 2 ) validation measurements on soil reports dataset. The results provide a comparison of solution classes and conclude that the SGD outperforms other approaches. Finally, the proposed results support to select the solution or recommend a class which suggests suitable fertilizer to crops for maximum production.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghu Garg & Himanshu Aggarwal & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2019. "Extracting Knowledge from Big Data for Sustainability: A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6669-:d:290792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miltiades D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2019. "Big Data and Their Social Impact: Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthony Cawley & Kevin Heanue & Rachel Hilliard & Cathal O’Donoghue & Maura Sheehan, 2023. "How Knowledge Transfer Impact Happens at the Farm Level: Insights from Advisers and Farmers in the Irish Agricultural Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Danial Jahed Armaghani & Panagiotis G. Asteris & Behnam Askarian & Mahdi Hasanipanah & Reza Tarinejad & Van Van Huynh, 2020. "Examining Hybrid and Single SVM Models with Different Kernels to Predict Rock Brittleness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Hyun-Jun Choi & Sewon Kim & YoungSeok Kim & Jongmuk Won, 2022. "Predicting Frost Depth of Soils in South Korea Using Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Xiaobo Xue Romeiko & Zhijian Guo & Yulei Pang & Eun Kyung Lee & Xuesong Zhang, 2020. "Comparing Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Spatially Explicit Life Cycle Global Warming and Eutrophication Impacts from Corn Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Berardi & Laurie Mook, 2023. "New digital technologies for social impact assessment: Considerations for Italian social economy organizations," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2 Suppl.), pages 109-132.
    2. Haili Zhang & Michael Song & Huanhuan He, 2020. "Achieving the Success of Sustainability Development Projects through Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Shengbin Hao & Haili Zhang & Michael Song, 2019. "Big Data, Big Data Analytics Capability, and Sustainable Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Remigiusz Tunowski, 2020. "Sustainability of Commercial Banks Supported by Business Intelligence System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. João Reis & Paula Santo & Nuno Melão, 2020. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence Research on Politics of the European Union Member States: The Case Study of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6669-:d:290792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.