IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p6158-d283522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigation of CO 2 and N 2 O Emission from Cabbage Fields in Korea by Optimizing Tillage Depth and N-Fertilizer Level: DNDC Model Simulation under RCP 8.5 Scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Wonjae Hwang

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Minseok Park

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Kijong Cho

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Jeong-Gyu Kim

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Seunghun Hyun

    (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

In this study, we applied the Denitrification and Decomposition model to predict the greenhouse gas (GHGs; CO 2 and N 2 O) emissions and cabbage yields from 8072 cabbage fields in Korea in the 2020s and 2090s. Model outputs were evaluated as a function of tillage depth (T1, T2, and T3 for 10, 20, and 30 cm) and fertilizer level (F1, F2, and F3 for 100, 200, and 400 kg N ha −1 ) under the Representative Concentration Pathways 8.5 climate change scenario. For both time periods, CO 2 emissions increased with tillage depth, and N 2 O emissions were predominantly influenced by the level of applied N-fertilizers. Both cabbage yields and GHGs fluxes were highest when the T3F3 farming practice was applied. Under current conventional farming practices (T1F3), cabbage yield was projected at 64.5 t ha −1 in the 2020s, which was close in magnitude to the predicted cabbage demand. In the 2090s, the predicted cabbage supply by the same practice far exceeded the projected demand at 28.9 t ha −1 . Cabbage supply and demand were balanced and GHGs emissions reduced by 19.6% in the 2090s when 94% of the total cabbage farms adopted low carbon-farming practices (e.g., reducing fertilizer level). Our results demonstrate the large potential for Korean cabbage farms to significantly contribute towards the mitigation of GHGs emissions through the adoption of low-carbon farming practices. However, in order to incentivize the shift towards sustainable farming, we advise that lower yield and potential economic losses in farmlands from adopting low-carbon practices should be appropriately compensated by institutional policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonjae Hwang & Minseok Park & Kijong Cho & Jeong-Gyu Kim & Seunghun Hyun, 2019. "Mitigation of CO 2 and N 2 O Emission from Cabbage Fields in Korea by Optimizing Tillage Depth and N-Fertilizer Level: DNDC Model Simulation under RCP 8.5 Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6158-:d:283522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kragt, M.E. & Gibson, F.L. & Maseyk, F. & Wilson, K.A., 2016. "Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 125-131.
    2. Yun, Jin I., 2003. "Predicting regional rice production in South Korea using spatial data and crop-growth modeling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 23-38, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min-Suk Kim & Namin Koo & Seunghun Hyun & Jeong-Gyu Kim, 2020. "Comparison of Ammonia Emission Estimation between Passive Sampler and Chamber System in Paddy Soil after Fertilizer Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Shangshu Huang & Mahbub Ul Islam & Fahui Jiang, 2023. "The effect of deep-tillage depths on crop yield: A global meta-analysis," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 105-117.
    3. Will McConnell, 2020. "Introduction to Sustainability Journal Special Edition “Global Warming and Sustainability Issues”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-7, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbie A. Rogers & Fiona L. Dempster & Jacob I. Hawkins & Robert J. Johnston & Peter C. Boxall & John Rolfe & Marit E. Kragt & Michael P. Burton & David J. Pannell, 2019. "Valuing non-market economic impacts from natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1131-1161, November.
    2. Jinglun Peng & Moonju Kim & Kyungil Sung, 2020. "Yield Prediction Modeling for Sorghum–Sudangrass Hybrid Based on Climatic, Soil, and Cultivar Data in the Republic of Korea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Mst Asma Khatun & Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2020. "Cooperation and cognition gaps for salinity: A field experiment of information provision," Working Papers SDES-2020-4, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Jun 2020.
    4. Tina L. Saitone & Richard J. Sexton, 2017. "Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(4), pages 634-657.
    5. Cristiano Franceschinis & Ulf Liebe & Mara Thiene & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Damien Field & Alex McBratney, 2022. "The effect of social and personal norms on stated preferences for multiple soil functions: evidence from Australia and Italy," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(2), pages 335-362, April.
    6. Fei Li & Shuwen Zhang & Xinliang Xu & Jiuchun Yang & Qing Wang & Kun Bu & Liping Chang, 2015. "The Response of Grain Potential Productivity to Land Use Change: A Case Study in Western Jilin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Jahel, Camille & Baron, Christian & Vall, Eric & Karambiri, Medina & Castets, Mathieu & Coulibaly, Kalifa & Bégué, Agnès & Lo Seen, Danny, 2017. "Spatial modelling of agro-ecosystem dynamics across scales: A case in the cotton region of West-Burkina Faso," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 303-315.
    8. Liuyang Yao & Minjuan Zhao & Yu Cai & Zhaowei Yin, 2018. "Public Preferences for the Design of a Farmland Retirement Project: Using Choice Experiments in Urban and Rural Areas of Wuwei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Johannes Dahlin & Verena Halbherr & Peter Kurz & Michael Nelles & Carsten Herbes, 2016. "Marketing Green Fertilizers: Insights into Consumer Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Wolfgang Buchholz & Dirk Rübbelke, 2020. "Overstraining International Climate Finance: When Conflicts of Objectives Threaten Its Succes," Working Papers 2020.17, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Faramarzi, Monireh & Yang, Hong & Schulin, Rainer & Abbaspour, Karim C., 2010. "Modeling wheat yield and crop water productivity in Iran: Implications of agricultural water management for wheat production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1861-1875, November.
    12. Baumber, Alex & Metternicht, Graciela & Cross, Rebecca & Ruoso, Laure-Elise & Cowie, Annette L. & Waters, Cathleen, 2019. "Promoting co-benefits of carbon farming in Oceania: Applying and adapting approaches and metrics from existing market-based schemes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    13. Luisa Fernanda Eusse-Villa & Cristiano Franceschinis & Mara Thiene & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Alex McBratney & Damien Field, 2021. "Attitudes and Preferences towards Soil-Based Ecosystem Services: How Do They Vary across Space?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Kragt, M.E. & Gibson, F.L. & Maseyk, F. & Wilson, K.A., 2016. "Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 125-131.
    15. Shannan K. Sweet & Jonathon P. Schuldt & Johannes Lehmann & Deborah A. Bossio & Dominic Woolf, 2021. "Perceptions of naturalness predict US public support for Soil Carbon Storage as a climate solution," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Birkenberg, A., 2018. "Carbon neutral global value chains: demand or desire? - Consumers willingness to pay for a carbon neutrality label on specialty coffee in Germany," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277277, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Otte, Pia Piroschka & Vik, Jostein, 2017. "Biochar systems: Developing a socio-technical system framework for biochar production in Norway," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 34-45.
    18. Maton, L. & Leenhardt, D. & Goulard, M. & Bergez, J.-E., 2005. "Assessing the irrigation strategies over a wide geographical area from structural data about farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 293-311, December.
    19. Lokuge, Nimanthika & Anders, Sven, 2022. "Carbon-Credit Systems in Agriculture: A Review of Literature," SPP Technical Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 15(12), April.
    20. Qinpeng Wang & Longfei He & Daozhi Zhao & Michele Lundy, 2018. "Diverse Schemes of Cost Pooling for Carbon-Reduction Outsourcing in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6158-:d:283522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.