IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4513-d259403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support or Risk? Software Project Risk Assessment Model Based on Rough Set Theory and Backpropagation Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqing Li

    (School of Economics & Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Qingquan Jiang

    (School of Economics & Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

  • Maxwell K. Hsu

    (Marketing, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI 53190, USA)

  • Qinglan Chen

    (School of Economics & Management, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China)

Abstract

Software supports continuous economic growth but has risks of uncertainty. In order to improve the risk-assessing accuracy of software project development, this paper proposes an assessment model based on the combination of backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and rough set theory (RST). First, a risk list with 35 risk factors were grouped into six risk categories via the brainstorming method and the original sample data set was constructed according to the initial risk list. Subsequently, an attribute reduction algorithm of the rough set was used to eliminate the redundancy attributes from the original sample dataset. The input factors of the software project risk assessment model could be reduced from thirty-five to twelve by the attribute reduction. Finally, the refined sample data subset was used to train the BPNN and the test sample data subset was used to verify the trained BPNN. The test results showed that the proposed joint model could achieve a better assessment than the model based only on the BPNN.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqing Li & Qingquan Jiang & Maxwell K. Hsu & Qinglan Chen, 2019. "Support or Risk? Software Project Risk Assessment Model Based on Rough Set Theory and Backpropagation Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4513-:d:259403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bimal Nepal & Om Prakash Yadav, 2015. "Bayesian belief network-based framework for sourcing risk analysis during supplier selection," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6114-6135, October.
    2. Feng Zhang & Yuanyuan Wang & Minjie Cao & Xiaoxiao Sun & Zhenhong Du & Renyi Liu & Xinyue Ye, 2016. "Deep-Learning-Based Approach for Prediction of Algal Blooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Su, Chao-Ton & Hsu, Jyh-Hwa, 2006. "Precision parameter in the variable precision rough sets model: an application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 149-157, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingyuan Chen & Yong Deng, 2022. "An Evidential Software Risk Evaluation Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Yanhua Chang & Yi Liang, 2023. "Intelligent Risk Assessment of Ecological Agriculture Projects from a Vision of Low Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radoslav Delina & Renata Olejarova & Petr Doucek, 2023. "Effect of a new potential supplier on business to business negotiations performance: evidence-based analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1941-1970, September.
    2. Liang, Wen-Yau & Huang, Chun-Che, 2008. "A hybrid approach to constrained evolutionary computing: Case of product synthesis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1072-1085, December.
    3. Faghih-Roohi, Shahrzad & Akcay, Alp & Zhang, Yingqian & Shekarian, Ehsan & de Jong, Eelco, 2020. "A group risk assessment approach for the selection of pharmaceutical product shipping lanes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Gülcan Petriçli & Gül Gökay Emel, 2016. "Determining Strategy Based Supplier Pre-Qualification Criteria With Fuzzy Relational Maps," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 4(2), pages 11-40, September.
    5. Chen, Li-Fei & Tsai, Chih-Tsung, 2016. "Data mining framework based on rough set theory to improve location selection decisions: A case study of a restaurant chain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 197-206.
    6. Liu, Zhi-bin & Liu, Shutang & Wang, Wen & Wang, Da, 2021. "Effect of herd-taxis on the self-organization of a plankton community," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Zhou, Rui & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Sherwin, Michael D. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for selecting supplier development programs to proactively mitigate supplier risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Surya Prakash & Sameer Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Vipul Jain & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2020. "Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 837-864, July.
    9. Yash Daultani & Mohit Goswami & Omkarprasad S. Vaidya & Sushil Kumar, 2019. "Inclusive risk modeling for manufacturing firms: a Bayesian network approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2789-2803, December.
    10. Mohebalizadehgashti, Fatemeh & Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh, 2020. "Designing a green meat supply chain network: A multi-objective approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 312-327.
    11. Wenbing Chang & Xinglong Yuan & Yalong Wu & Shenghan Zhou & Jingsong Lei & Yiyong Xiao, 2019. "Decision-Making Method based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming and Rough Set: A Case Study of Diesel Engine Quality and Assembly Clearance Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Abroon Qazi & Mecit Can Emre Simsekler & Steven Formaneck, 2023. "Supply chain risk network value at risk assessment using Bayesian belief networks and Monte Carlo simulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 241-272, March.
    13. Nikelowski, Lukas & Voss, Rika, 2021. "Approach for application-specific selection of risk assessment methods," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 853-877, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4513-:d:259403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.