IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4486-d258947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laundry Habits in Bangkok: Use Patterns of Products and Services

Author

Listed:
  • Dami Moon

    (Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

  • Eri Amasawa

    (Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

  • Masahiko Hirao

    (Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

Abstract

This study aimed to define the use of product–service system (PSS) associated with laundry businesses, such as coin-operated self-service laundromats (CL) and laundry services (LS), in order to get a better understanding of the environmental implications of PSS in laundry habits in Bangkok, Thailand. The motivation to use PSS could vary according to the specific consumer needs often defined by cultures, and therefore the environmental impacts from the PSS use would result differently from country to country. Questionnaires and in-depth interviews were conducted with Bangkok residents to determine the laundry habits related to the use of PSS. As a result, the use of private washing machines (PW) was found to be the main option, and CL and LS were used as an additional option in the laundry habits. The most widely observed use pattern in Bangkok was the use of CL as an alternative to PW instead of buying a new machine for a new life in dormitories or other residences away from home. At that time, hand washing (HW) was also used for saving money and for the cleanliness. Regarding the environmental potential, the relationship between the PSS users and laundry habits was specifically analyzed. The group who uses PSS frequently tended to do laundry less often than those who only use PW. Meanwhile, the need for even more services is also expected to increase among the PSS users. The need to improve the quality of laundry is expected to increase with the improvement of quality of living in Bangkok in the near future. However, at the same time, these observations imply that a change of consumer behaviors related to the use of PSS determines the resulting energy consumption and environmental burdens. To further clarify sustainable consumption and production systems, a quantitative analysis of the environmental impact of the laundry habits remains as a future task.

Suggested Citation

  • Dami Moon & Eri Amasawa & Masahiko Hirao, 2019. "Laundry Habits in Bangkok: Use Patterns of Products and Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4486-:d:258947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monique Retamal & Heinz Schandl, 2018. "Dirty Laundry in Manila: Comparing Resource Consumption Practices for Individual and Shared Laundering," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1389-1401, December.
    2. Arnold Tukker & Maurie J. Cohen & Klaus Hubacek & Oksana Mont, 2010. "Sustainable Consumption and Production," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3, January.
    3. Halme, Minna & Jasch, Christine & Scharp, Michael, 2004. "Sustainable homeservices? Toward household services that enhance ecological, social and economic sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 125-138, November.
    4. Eri Amasawa & Yurie Suzuki & Dami Moon & Jun Nakatani & Hirokazu Sugiyama & Masahiko Hirao, 2018. "Designing Interventions for Behavioral Shifts toward Product Sharing: The Case of Laundry Activities in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Wencke Gwozdz & Kristian Steensen Nielsen & Tina Müller, 2017. "An Environmental Perspective on Clothing Consumption: Consumer Segments and Their Behavioral Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    7. Jonathan M. Cullen & Julian M. Allwood, 2009. "The Role of Washing Machines in Life Cycle Assessment Studies: The Dangers of Using LCA for Prioritization," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(1), pages 27-37, February.
    8. Seungkyum Kim & Changho Son & Byungun Yoon & Yongtae Park, 2015. "Development of an Innovation Model Based on a Service-Oriented Product Service System (PSS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarunnoud Phuphisith & Kiyo Kurisu, 2022. "Understanding the Determinants and Motivations for Collaborative Consumption in Laundromats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Dami Moon & Eri Amasawa & Masahiko Hirao, 2020. "Consumer Motivation and Environmental Impact of Laundry Machine-Sharing: Analysis of Surveys in Tokyo and Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariusz Salwin & Ilona Jacyna-Gołda & Andrzej Kraslawski & Aneta Ewa Waszkiewicz, 2022. "The Use of Business Model Canvas in the Design and Classification of Product-Service Systems Design Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    3. Dami Moon & Eri Amasawa & Masahiko Hirao, 2020. "Consumer Motivation and Environmental Impact of Laundry Machine-Sharing: Analysis of Surveys in Tokyo and Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Xiaojun Wang & Xu Chen & Christopher Durugbo & Ziming Cai, 2020. "Manage risk of sustainable product–service systems: a case-based operations research approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 897-920, August.
    5. Hakyeon Lee & Hanbin Seo & Youngjung Geum, 2018. "Uncovering the Topic Landscape of Product-Service System Research: from Sustainability to Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Till Blüher & Theresa Riedelsheimer & Sonika Gogineni & Antje Klemichen & Rainer Stark, 2020. "Systematic Literature Review—Effects of PSS on Sustainability Based on Use Case Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Steven Day & Janet Godsell & Donato Masi & Wanrong Zhang, 2020. "Predicting consumer adoption of branded subscription services: A prospect theory perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1310-1330, March.
    8. Moa Nyvall & Thomas Zobel & Cecilia Mark‐Herbert, 2023. "Use‐oriented business model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1314-1324, May.
    9. Sarunnoud Phuphisith & Kiyo Kurisu, 2022. "Understanding the Determinants and Motivations for Collaborative Consumption in Laundromats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Jürgen Anke, 2019. "Design-integrated financial assessment of smart services," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(1), pages 19-35, March.
    11. Nine Klaassen & Arno Scheepens & Bas Flipsen & Joost Vogtlander, 2020. "Eco-Efficient Value Creation of Residential Street Lighting Systems by Simultaneously Analysing the Value, the Costs and the Eco-Costs during the Design and Engineering Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Kley, Fabian & Lerch, Christian & Dallinger, David, 2011. "New business models for electric cars--A holistic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3392-3403, June.
    14. Fabio Antonialli & Rodrigo Gandia & Joel Sugano & Isabelle Nicolaï & Arthur Neto, 2019. "Business Platforms For Autonomous Vehicles Within Urban Mobility," Post-Print halshs-03687640, HAL.
    15. Wiebke Reim & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2021. "Circular business model implementation: A capability development case study from the manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2745-2757, September.
    16. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Siri Jagstedt & Magnus Persson, 2019. "Using Platform Strategies In The Development Of Integrated Product-Service Solutions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    18. Fabio Antonialli & Bruna Habib Cavazza & Rodrigo Gandia & Isabelle Nicolaï & Arthur de Miranda Neto & Joel Sugano & André Luiz Zambalde, 2020. "Human or machine driving? Comparing autonomous with traditional vehicles value curves and motives to use a car," Post-Print halshs-03687616, HAL.
    19. Pan, Jeh-Nan & Nguyen, Hung Thi Ngoc, 2015. "Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 179-190.
    20. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4486-:d:258947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.