IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3726-d246605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Revenue Collection for Preventative Maintenance of Community Water Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liesbet Olaerts

    (Self Help Enterprises, Visalia, CA 93291, USA)

  • Jeffrey P. Walters

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, George Fox University, Newberg, OR 97132, USA)

  • Karl G. Linden

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

  • Amy Javernick-Will

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

  • Adam Harvey

    (Whave, Kampala 72305, Uganda)

Abstract

This study analyzed combinations of conditions that influence regular payments for water service in resource-limited communities. To do so, the study investigated 16 communities participating in a new preventive maintenance program in the Kamuli District of Uganda under a public–private partnership framework. First, this study identified conditions posited as important for collective payment compliance from a literature review. Then, drawing from data included in a water source report and by conducting semi-structured interviews with households and water user committees (WUC), we identified communities that were compliant with, or suspended from, preventative maintenance service payments. Through qualitative analyses of these data and case knowledge, we identified and characterized conditions that appeared to contribute to these outcomes. Then, we employed fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to determine the combinations of conditions that led to payment compliance. Overall, the findings from this study reveal distinct pathways of conditions that impact payment compliance and reflect the multifaceted nature of water point sustainability. Practically, the findings identify the processes needed for successful payment compliance, which include a strong WUC with proper support and training, user perceptions that the water quality is high and available in adequate quantities, ongoing support, and a lack of nearby water sources. A comprehensive understanding of the combined factors that lead to payment compliance can improve future preventative maintenance programs, guide the design of water service arrangements, and ultimately increase water service sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Liesbet Olaerts & Jeffrey P. Walters & Karl G. Linden & Amy Javernick-Will & Adam Harvey, 2019. "Factors Influencing Revenue Collection for Preventative Maintenance of Community Water Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3726-:d:246605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koehler, Johanna & Thomson, Patrick & Hope, Robert, 2015. "Pump-Priming Payments for Sustainable Water Services in Rural Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 397-411.
    2. Elizabeth Jordan & Martha Gross & Amy Javernick-Will & Michael Garvin, 2011. "Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(11), pages 1159-1173.
    3. Aaron Opdyke & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of Coordination, Participation, and Training in Post-Disaster Shelter Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Andrew Quin & Berit Balfors & Marianne Kjellén, 2011. "How to “walk the talk”: The perspectives of sector staff on implementation of the rural water supply programme in Uganda," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35, pages 269-282, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith, Daniel W. & Atwii Ongom, Stephen & Davis, Jennifer, 2023. "Does professionalizing maintenance unlock demand for more reliable water supply? Experimental evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Jingru Li & Jinxiao Ji & Jian Zuo & Yi Tan, 2023. "Is Policy the Necessary or Sufficient Driving Force of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry Development? Experience from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaye Palagi & Amy Javernick-Will, 2020. "Pathways to Livable Relocation Settlements Following Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2019. "Configurational Analysis of Access to Basic Infrastructure Services: Evidence from Turkish Provinces," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1341-1370, December.
    3. Smith, Daniel W. & Atwii Ongom, Stephen & Davis, Jennifer, 2023. "Does professionalizing maintenance unlock demand for more reliable water supply? Experimental evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Koehler, Johanna & Thomson, Patrick & Goodall, Susanna & Katuva, Jacob & Hope, Rob, 2021. "Institutional pluralism and water user behavior in rural Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    5. Elizabeth Jordan & Amy Javernick-Will & Kathleen Tierney, 2016. "Post-tsunami recovery in Tamil Nadu, India: combined social and infrastructural outcomes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(2), pages 1327-1347, November.
    6. Iyer K. Chandrashekhar & Banerjee Partha S., 2019. "Identifying New Knowledge Areas to Strengthen the Project Management Institute (PMI) Framework," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1892-1903, March.
    7. Carlitz, Ruth D., 2017. "Money Flows, Water Trickles: Understanding Patterns of Decentralized Water Provision in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 16-30.
    8. Lara Alshawawreh & Francesco Pomponi & Bernardino D’Amico & Susan Snaddon & Peter Guthrie, 2020. "Qualifying the Sustainability of Novel Designs and Existing Solutions for Post-Disaster and Post-Conflict Sheltering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Fiorini, Matteo & Hoekman, Bernard, 2018. "Services trade policy and sustainable development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Yuliani, E.L. & de Groot, W.T. & Knippenberg, Luuk & Bakara, D.O., 2020. "Forest or oil palm plantation? Interpretation of local responses to the oil palm promises in Kalimantan, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Daniel L Wilson & Jeremy R Coyle & Evan A Thomas, 2017. "Ensemble machine learning and forecasting can achieve 99% uptime for rural handpumps," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Casie Venable & Amy Javernick-Will & Abbie B. Liel, 2020. "Perceptions of Post-Disaster Housing Safety in Future Typhoons and Earthquakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, May.
    13. Vu Minh Ngo & Huan Huu Nguyen & Hiep Cong Pham & Long Hoang Nguyen, 2024. "Engage or retreat? Exploring the determinants of participation in Climate Finance public-private partnerships," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(7), pages 1-30, July.
    14. Invernizzi, Diletta Colette & Locatelli, Giorgio & Brookes, Naomi & Davis, Allison, 2020. "Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for project studies: The case of energy infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    15. An, Yehyun & Garvin, Michael J. & Hall, Ralph P., 2017. "Pathways to Better Project Delivery: The Link Between Capacity Factors and Urban Infrastructure Projects in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 393-405.
    16. Shin, Hoon C. & Yu, David J. & Park, Samuel & Anderies, John M. & Abbott, Joshua K. & Janssen, Marco A. & Ahn, T.K., 2020. "How do resource mobility and group size affect institutional arrangements for rule enforcement? A qualitative comparative analysis of fishing groups in South Korea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Jacob Katuva & Rob Hope & Tim Foster & Johanna Koehler & Patrick Thomson, 2020. "Modelling Welfare Transitions to Prioritise Sustainable Development Interventions in Coastal Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Yoruk, Deniz E. & Bunduchi, Raluca & Yoruk, Esin & Crișan-Mitra, Catalina & Salanță, Irina-Iulia & Crișan, Emil Lucian, 2021. "Pathways to innovation in Romanian software SMEs: Exploring the impact of interdependencies between internationalisation and knowledge sources," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4).
    19. Jake Wagner & Joseph Cook & Peter Kimuyu, 2019. "Household Demand for Water in Rural Kenya," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(4), pages 1563-1584, December.
    20. G. M. Harun-Or-Rashid & Juan Jose Castro & Mithun Chakrabartty & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2022. "Proposal of Resilient Housing Features for the Disaster Affected Community of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3726-:d:246605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.