IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3609-d244534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Main Performance and Effectiveness Factors of Sustainable Financial Administration Reform Using Multidimensional Statistical Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Kot

    (The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 19B, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland
    Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, PO Box 1174, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

  • Róbert Štefko

    (Faculty of management, University of Prešov in Prešov, Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Ján Dobrovič

    (Faculty of management, University of Prešov in Prešov, Konštantínova 16, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia)

  • Rastislav Rajnoha

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, nám. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Váchal

    (Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The tax system reform is a part of Slovakia’s comprehensive tax and levies reform. The reform should contribute to improving and making public finances more efficient. Its implementation into practice, however, is problematic due to attitudes and problems on the part of both the professional public and business entities. The aim of the paper is to help public authorities, and also tax policymakers and business entities to understand the perception of the tax system reform focusing on the most important and key factors of its sustainable effectiveness and performance in the context of its non-macroeconomic especially social, technological and process aspects. The analysis reveals the differences in perceptions of key factors from the viewpoint of the three studied groups. The paper is based on the information of the main actors of tax reform. In extensive empirical quantitative research ( N = 1500), the data was obtained through the questionnaire survey carried out in four main districts of Slovakia. The data obtained during six months of 2018 using the questionnaire method were processed by basic statistical methods of descriptive statistics, followed by an analysis of major components and the factor analysis using more sophisticated multidimensional statistical tools. The factor analysis is crucial to the present paper as it has identified five significant indicators of the reform assessment and the functioning of the tax system after tax reform. Subsequently, a correspondence analysis has been applied to the item “electronization/computerization—great user comfort” to find out the differences in its perception by the respondents. The article thus provides a new scientific view on the evaluation of the reform of the financial administration’s management system in the Slovak Republic as well as its functioning in the context of its sustainable effectiveness and performance. The research results offer important and exciting implications and also motives for further investigation on the issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Kot & Róbert Štefko & Ján Dobrovič & Rastislav Rajnoha & Jan Váchal, 2019. "The Main Performance and Effectiveness Factors of Sustainable Financial Administration Reform Using Multidimensional Statistical Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3609-:d:244534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3609/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3609/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnė Šimelytė & Jūratė Antanavičienė, 2013. "Economic development and its influence on state capital structure," Post-Print hal-01694339, HAL.
    2. Valasek, Justin, 2018. "Dynamic reform of public institutions: A model of motivated agents and collective reputation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 94-108.
    3. Josse Delfgaauw & Robert Dur, 2008. "Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 171-191, January.
    4. repec:bri:cmpowp:12/299 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ligita Gasparėnienė & Rita Remeikienė & Alius Sadeckas & Romualdas Ginevičius, 2016. "Level and sectors of digital shadow economy: the case of Lithuania," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(2), pages 183-197, December.
    6. Robert Stefko & Radovan Bacik & Igor Fedorko & Richard Fedorko, 2015. "An Analysis Of Perceived Topicality Of Website Content Influence In Terms Of Reputation Management," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 177-185, DEcember.
    7. Ms. Era Dabla-Norris & Florian Misch & Mr. Duncan Cleary & Munawer Khwaja, 2017. "Tax Administration and Firm Performance: New Data and Evidence for Emerging Market and Developing Economies," IMF Working Papers 2017/095, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Mina Fanea-Ivanovici & Radu-Cristian Muşetescu & Marius-Cristian Pană & Cristina Voicu, 2019. "Fighting Corruption and Enhancing Tax Compliance through Digitization: Achieving Sustainable Development in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    9. James Alm & Yongzheng Liu & Kewei Zhang, 2019. "Financial constraints and firm tax evasion," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 26(1), pages 71-102, February.
    10. Edd Cowley & Sarah Smith, 2014. "Motivation and mission in the public sector: evidence from the World Values Survey," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 241-263, February.
    11. Juraj Tej & Peter Živčák & Viktória Ali Taha & Michaela Sirkova, 2014. "Crisis Awareness Of The Municipal District Residents: Implication For Crisis Management At The Local Government Level," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 18(2).
    12. Jens Matthias Arnold & Bert Brys & Christopher Heady & Åsa Johansson & Cyrille Schwellnus & Laura Vartia, 2011. "Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(550), pages 59-80, February.
    13. Banerjee, Ritwik & Baul, Tushi & Rosenblat, Tanya, 2015. "On self selection of the corrupt into the public sector," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 43-46.
    14. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Adriana Ana Maria Davidescu & Catalin Huidumac, 2018. "Researching the Main Causes of the Romanian Shadow Economy at the Micro and Macro Levels: Implications for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-37, September.
    15. Lei Zhang & Yuyu Chen & Zongyan He, 2018. "The effect of investment tax incentives: evidence from China’s value-added tax reform," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(4), pages 913-945, August.
    16. Yoko Niimi, 2019. "The Effect of the Recent Inheritance Tax Reform on Bequest Behaviour in Japan," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 45-70, March.
    17. Dyuti S. Banerjee & Samarth Vaidya, 2019. "Anticorruption reforms, tax evasion, and the role of harassment," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(1), pages 62-80, February.
    18. Eva Koisova & Jozef Habanik & Zuzana Virglerova & Zoltan Rozsa, 2017. "SMEs Financing as an Important Factor of Business Environment in Slovak Republic Regions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 129-140.
    19. Azémar, Céline & Dharmapala, Dhammika, 2019. "Tax sparing agreements, territorial tax reforms, and foreign direct investment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 89-108.
    20. Ingrid Majerova, 2016. "The Impact Of Some Variables On The Vat Gap In The Member States Of The European Union Company*," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(3), pages 339-355, September.
    21. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:129-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ján Dobroviè & Rastislav Rajnoha & Petr Šuleø, 2021. "Tax evasion in the EU countries following a predictive analysis and a forecast model for Slovakia," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(3), pages 701-728, September.
    2. Antonín Korauš & Miroslav Gombár & Alena Vagaská & Stanislav Šišulák & Filip Černák, 2021. "Secondary Energy Sources and Their Optimization in the Context of the Tax Gap on Petrol and Diesel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Ștefan VLĂDUȚESCU, 2019. "Managerial Style, Determinations And Risks," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 6(2), pages 115-130, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ján Dobroviè & Rastislav Rajnoha & Petr Šuleø, 2021. "Tax evasion in the EU countries following a predictive analysis and a forecast model for Slovakia," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(3), pages 701-728, September.
    2. Valasek, Justin, 2018. "Dynamic reform of public institutions: A model of motivated agents and collective reputation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 94-108.
    3. Segundo Camino‐Mogro, 2023. "Tax incentives, private investment and employment: Evidence from an Ecuadorian reform," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 2129-2156, October.
    4. Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2015. "Are public sector workers different? Cross-European evidence from elderly workers and retirees," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Guido Friebel & Michael Kosfeld & Gerd Thielmann, 2019. "Trust the Police? Self-Selection of Motivated Agents into the German Police Force," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 59-78, November.
    6. Lucia Rizzica, 2016. "Why go public? A study of the individual determinants of public sector employment choice," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 343, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Dur, Robert & van Lent, Max, 2018. "Serving the public interest in several ways: Theory and empirics," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 13-24.
    8. repec:bla:annpce:v:89:y:2018:i:1:p:157-174 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hoffmann, Lisa, 2023. "(Ch)eating for oneself or cheating for others? Experimental evidence from young politicians and students in Kenya," OSF Preprints xnez5, Center for Open Science.
    10. Mocetti, Sauro & Orlando, Tommaso, 2019. "Corruption, workforce selection and mismatch in the public sector," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Li, Xing & Shen, Guangjun, 2023. "Do tax incentives decelerate corporate financialization? Evidence from the VAT reform in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    12. Frederico Finan & Benjamin A. Olken & Rohini Pande, 2015. "The Personnel Economics of the State," NBER Working Papers 21825, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Jing Xing, 2011. "Does tax structure affect economic growth? Empirical evidence from OECD countries," Working Papers 1120, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    14. Francesca Gastaldi & Paolo Liberati & Elena Pisano & Simone Tedeschi, 2014. "Progressivity-Improving VAT Reforms in Italy," Working papers 6, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    15. Pierre Koning & J. Vyrastekova & S. Onderstal, 2006. "Team incentives in public organisations; an experimental study," CPB Discussion Paper 60, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Bermperoglou, Dimitrios & Deli, Yota & Kalyvitis, Sarantis, 2019. "Investment tax incentives and their big time-to-build fiscal multiplier," Kiel Working Papers 2143, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    17. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & František Sudzina & Terézia Barlašová, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Investment Incentives in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Manna, Ester, 2013. "Mixed Duopoly with Motivated Teachers," MPRA Paper 52041, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Oguzhan Akgun & David Bartolini & Boris Cournède, 2017. "The capacity of governments to raise taxes," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1407, OECD Publishing.
    21. Sijbren Cnossen, 2015. "Mobilizing VAT revenues in African countries," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(6), pages 1077-1108, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3609-:d:244534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.