IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2979-d234226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Nitrogen Application Rates of One-Time Root Zone Fertilization and the Effect of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Summer Maize

Author

Listed:
  • Chaoqiang Jiang

    (Tobacco Research Institute/Maize Research Center, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xuexiang Ren

    (Institute of Plant Protection and Agro-products Safety, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Huoyan Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Dianjun Lu

    (State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Chaolong Zu

    (Tobacco Research Institute/Maize Research Center, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Shiji Wang

    (Tobacco Research Institute/Maize Research Center, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China)

Abstract

Improvement in fertilization methods, including the optimal matching of nutrient supply and root nutrient absorption by applying nitrogen (N) in the root zone of crop, is necessary to improve N use efficiency (NUE), maintain high stable yield cultivation of maize, and contribute toward future environmental protection. The current practice of split surface broadcasting (SSB) of N is labor-intensive and the surface broadcasting causes a large amount of N to leach into the environment, yet it does not substantially increase maize yield. Root zone fertilization (RZF) has been identified as an efficient way to solve such problems. However, information on the appropriate amount of N fertilizer under RZF for summer maize remains limited. Therefore, in this study, a two-year consecutive field experiment was conducted during 2015–2016 in Anhui province, China, to investigate the effect of N rate and application method on grain yield, nutrient uptake, and NUE of summer maize. The method chosen is not only important to increase grain yield but also critical for reducing N rate and potential loss in the maize cropping system. The experiment comprised six N rates (90, 135, 180, 225, 270, and 360 kg N hm −2 ) and two N application methods in both 2015 and 2016. The two N application methods included SSB and one-time RZF. Results showed that grain yield of summer maize increased first and then decreased with the increase of N rate; however, when the N rate increased to 270 kg hm −2 , the grain yield increased slowly or even decreased. Compared with SSB, RZF increased grain yield by 4%, and the effect of N on grain yield was mainly related to the number of kernels per ear and 1000-seed weight. One-time RZF increased N apparent recovery efficiency by 18% (7.2 percentage points) compared with SSB and also improved the N agronomic efficiency, N physiological efficiency, and N partial factor productivity. In the comprehensive consideration of yield target, NUE, and soil N balance, the optimal N rate for summer maize in the vertisol soil of Anhui province was 180–225 kg hm −2 for one-time RZF, which reduced N fertilizer by 14% compared with the SSB. Overall, one-time RZF has great potential for green and sustainable agriculture, and thus fertilization machines are worthy of development and application in maize cropping systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaoqiang Jiang & Xuexiang Ren & Huoyan Wang & Dianjun Lu & Chaolong Zu & Shiji Wang, 2019. "Optimal Nitrogen Application Rates of One-Time Root Zone Fertilization and the Effect of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Summer Maize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-10, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2979-:d:234226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Zhao & Xuyong Li & Yan Jiang, 2019. "Response of Nitrogen Losses to Excessive Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feifei Pan & Sha Pan & Jiao Tang & Jingping Yuan & Huaixia Zhang & Bihua Chen, 2022. "Fertilization Practices: Optimization in Greenhouse Vegetable Cultivation with Different Planting Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Feng, Qi & An, Chunjiang & Chen, Zhi & Wang, Zheng, 2020. "Can deep tillage enhance carbon sequestration in soils? A meta-analysis towards GHG mitigation and sustainable agricultural management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Na Sun & Liying Wang & Yanxin Sun & Hong Li & Shangqiang Liao & Jianli Ding & Guoliang Wang & Linna Suo & Yanmei Li & Guoyuan Zou & Shaowen Huang, 2022. "Positive Effects of Organic Substitution in Reduced-Fertilizer Regimes on Bacterial Diversity and N-Cycling Functionality in Greenhouse Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Xiaofei Yang & Kexing Liu & Yanmei Wen & Yongxiang Huang & Chao Zheng, 2023. "Application of Natural and Calcined Oyster Shell Powders to Improve Latosol and Manage Nitrogen Leaching," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Haijin Zheng & Zhao Liu & Xiaofei Nie & Jichao Zuo & Lingyun Wang, 2019. "Comparison of Active Nitrogen Loss in Four Pathways on a Sloped Peanut Field with Red Soil in China under Conventional Fertilization Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2979-:d:234226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.