IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2719-d230797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Permanent Vegetable Production Systems Designed with the PermVeg Model for the Red River Delta, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Pham T.T. Huong

    (Field Crops Research Institute, Hai Duong and Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam 11311, Hanoi, Vietnam)

  • Arij P. Everaarts

    (Applied Plant Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 430, 8200 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands)

  • Jacques J. Neeteson

    (Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Paul C. Struik

    (Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The aim of the research described was to design permanent vegetable production systems for the Red River Delta in Vietnam. Permanent vegetable production systems better meet the increasing consumer demand for vegetables and may increase farmers’ income. Optimum crop sequences for permanent vegetable production in the Red River Delta were designed with the recently developed model PermVeg. The crop sequences designed were tested in a field experiment from May 2007 to May 2009. The production systems tested were five systems designed according to the scenarios of (i) high profitability, (ii) low labor requirement, (iii) low costs of pesticide use, (iv) high level of crop biodiversity, and (v) low perishable products, respectively. The five systems were compared with the traditional vegetable production system. At local prices, only the high profitability and low labor requirement systems yielded significantly higher profits than the traditional system. At city wholesale market prices, profits of all permanent vegetable production systems were significantly higher than that of the traditional system, except for the low perishability system. Permanent vegetable production systems required more labor than the traditional system. Labor-day incomes of permanent vegetable production systems generally were not higher than those of the traditional system. The labor-day income increased only with the low labor requirement system at city wholesale market prices. The model outcomes correlated reasonably well with the labor requirement and the length in days of production systems in the field. The model poorly predicted profits and costs of pesticide use. We concluded that permanent vegetable production systems can yield higher profits than the traditional system, and can contribute to enhancing employment opportunities and increasing household income.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham T.T. Huong & Arij P. Everaarts & Jacques J. Neeteson & Paul C. Struik, 2019. "Performance of Permanent Vegetable Production Systems Designed with the PermVeg Model for the Red River Delta, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2719-:d:230797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco, Sergio R. & Ali, Mubarik, 2006. "Resource allocation tradeoffs in Manila's peri-urban vegetable production systems: An application of multiple objective programming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 147-168, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André, Francisco J. & Herrero, Inés & Riesgo, Laura, 2010. "A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 371-382, October.
    2. West, Jason, 2019. "Multi-criteria evolutionary algorithm optimization for horticulture crop management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 469-481.
    3. Hu, Ming-Che & Chen, Yu-Hui & Huang, Li-Chun, 2014. "A sustainable vegetable supply chain using plant factories in Taiwanese markets: A Nash–Cournot model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 49-56.
    4. Mostafa Mardani Najafabadi & Abbas Mirzaei & Hassan Azarm & Siamak Nikmehr, 2022. "Managing Water Supply and Demand to Achieve Economic and Environmental Objectives: Application of Mathematical Programming and ANFIS Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3007-3027, July.
    5. Wang, Shi-dong & Wang, Xin-chuang & Zhang, He-bing, 2015. "Simulation on optimized allocation of land resource based on DE-CA model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 314(C), pages 135-144.
    6. Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa & Ziaee, Saman & Nikouei, Alireza & Ahmadpour Borazjani, Mahmoud, 2019. "Mathematical programming model (MMP) for optimization of regional cropping patterns decisions: A case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 218-232.
    7. West, J., 2018. "Multi-criteria evolutionary algorithm optimization in horticulture crop management," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276940, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Francisco J. André & Inés Herrero & Laura Riesgo, 2007. "Using a modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives. An application to agricultural economics," Working Papers 07.09, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    9. Li-Chun Huang & Yu-Hui Chen & Ya-Hui Chen & Chi-Fang Wang & Ming-Che Hu, 2018. "Food-Energy Interactive Tradeoff Analysis of Sustainable Urban Plant Factory Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2719-:d:230797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.