IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3273-d169558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in Soil Properties and Productivity under Different Tillage Practices and Wheat Genotypes: A Short-Term Study in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Shokoofeh Sarikhani Khorami

    (Department of Seed and Plant Improvement Research, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shiraz 7341653111, Iran
    Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran)

  • Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini

    (Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran)

  • Sadegh Afzalinia

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering Research, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Shiraz 7341653111, Iran)

  • Mahesh Kumar Gathala

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh
    International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Tehran 3135933151, Iran)

Abstract

Natural resources are the most limiting factors for sustainable agriculture in Iran. Traditional practices are intensive tillage that leads to a negative impact on crop productivity and soil properties. Conservation agriculture including tillage reductions, better agronomy, and improved varieties, showed encouraging results. The goal of this study was to test combined effect of tillage practices and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes on soil properties as well as crop and water productivity. The experiment was conducted at Zarghan, Fars, Iran during 2014–2016. Experimental treatments were three-tillage practices—conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT), and no tillage (NT)—and four wheat genotypes were randomized in the main and subplots, respectively using split-plot randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed NT had higher soil bulk density at surface soil, thereby lower cumulative water infiltration. The lowest soil organic carbon and total nitrogen were obtained under CT that led to the highest C:N ratio. Reduced tillage produced higher wheat yield and maize ( Zea mays L.) biomass. Maximum irrigation water was applied under CT, which leads lower water productivity. The findings are based on short-term results, but it is important to evaluate medium- and long-term effects on soil properties, crop yields and water use in future.

Suggested Citation

  • Shokoofeh Sarikhani Khorami & Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini & Sadegh Afzalinia & Mahesh Kumar Gathala, 2018. "Changes in Soil Properties and Productivity under Different Tillage Practices and Wheat Genotypes: A Short-Term Study in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3273-:d:169558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3273/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3273/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elke Noellemeyer & Romina Fernández & Alberto Quiroga, 2013. "Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Majid Yousefian & Feizollah Shahbazi & Kianoosh Hamidian, 2021. "Crop Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat Grains as Affected by Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Nigussie Haregeweyn & Enyew Adgo & Mitsuru Tsubo & Tsugiyuki Masunaga & Derege Tsegaye Meshesha & Kindiye Ebabu & Muluken Bayable, 2021. "Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in Midland Agro-Ecology, Ethiopia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Magdalena Ruiz & Encarna Zambrana & Rosario Fite & Aida Sole & Jose Luis Tenorio & Elena Benavente, 2019. "Yield and Quality Performance of Traditional and Improved Bread and Durum Wheat Varieties under Two Conservation Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Ridha Boudiar & Khalid S. Alshallash & Khadiga Alharbi & Salah A. Okasha & Mohammed Fenni & Abdelhamid Mekhlouf & Bilal Fortas & Keirieddine Hamsi & Kamel Nadjem & Abdennour Belagrouz & Elsayed Mansou, 2022. "Influence of Tillage and Cropping Systems on Soil Properties and Crop Performance under Semi-Arid Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Xuezhang Li & Benhui Wei & Xianli Xu & Jia Zhou, 2020. "Effect of Deep Vertical Rotary Tillage on Soil Properties and Sugarcane Biomass in Rainfed Dry-Land Regions of Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Jianyu Yuan & Mahran Sadiq & Nasir Rahim & Majid Mahmood Tahir & Yunliang Liang & Macao Zhuo & Lijuan Yan & Aqila Shaheen & Basharat Mahmood & Guang Li, 2023. "Changes in Soil Properties and Crop Yield under Sustainable Conservation Tillage Systems in Spring Wheat Agroecosystems," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Dorota Gawęda & Małgorzata Haliniarz, 2022. "The Yield and Weed Infestation of Winter Oilseed Rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg) in Two Tillage Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Jinli & Hu, Wei & Wu, Jicheng & Yang, Yonghui & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Simulating the effects of conventional versus conservation tillage on soil water, nitrogen dynamics, and yield of winter wheat with RZWQM2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3273-:d:169558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.