IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3095-d166727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical Guidance on Evacuation Decisions after a Big Nuclear Accident under the Assumption That Evacuation Is Desirable

Author

Listed:
  • Yaling Deng

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changcha 410083, China)

  • Shuliang Zou

    (School of Management, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China)

  • Daming You

    (School of Business, Central South University, Changcha 410083, China)

Abstract

The development of nuclear power is a major measure for implementing energy-saving and emission reduction strategies all over the world. For a long time, the hazards of nuclear accidents have been obstacles to the development of nuclear power. Temporary evacuation is the fastest and most effective emergency measure to ensure the safety of residents in a short period of time after a nuclear accident. Numerous nuclear accident emergency management personnel make judgments based on personal work experience and subjective awareness when formulating a nuclear accident emergency evacuation plan. How to make a scientific and reasonable decision on the emergency evacuation of nuclear accidents in the shortest time is a common problem faced by many emergency departments when a nuclear accident occurs. In a complex and ever-changing radiation environment, how to maximize the use of limited information and make decisions quickly in an uncertain environment is a core issue that effectively reduces the risk of nuclear accidents. This paper constructs a set of assessment system of nuclear accident emergency evacuation plan selection based on the characteristics of nuclear accident emergencies under uncertain environmental conditions. It uses triangular fuzzy language to describe nuclear accident emergency evacuation decision plans and the weighting of relevant factors. Additionally, the K-means clustering method is used to calculate the weight of experts, which reduces the influence of subjective factors considered by decision makers. Finally, a decision model for emergency evacuation of nuclear accidents is constructed based on the TOPSIS decision model.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaling Deng & Shuliang Zou & Daming You, 2018. "Theoretical Guidance on Evacuation Decisions after a Big Nuclear Accident under the Assumption That Evacuation Is Desirable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3095-:d:166727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geert Soete, 1988. "OVWTRE: A program for optimal variable weighting for ultrametric and additive tree fitting," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(1), pages 101-104, March.
    2. Wayne DeSarbo & J. Carroll & Linda Clark & Paul Green, 1984. "Synthesized clustering: A method for amalgamating alternative clustering bases with differential weighting of variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 57-78, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inmaculada Silla & Francisco J. Gracia & José M. Peiró, 2020. "Upward Voice: Participative Decision Making, Trust in Leadership and Safety Climate Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Bongseok Kim & Hyeonmyeong Jeon & Bongsoo Son, 2020. "Evaluation of Evacuation Strategies According to the Travel Demand: The Case of Nuclear Research Reactor HANARO’s EPZ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renato Cordeiro Amorim, 2016. "A Survey on Feature Weighting Based K-Means Algorithms," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(2), pages 210-242, July.
    2. Renato Amorim, 2015. "Feature Relevance in Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering Using the L p Norm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(1), pages 46-62, April.
    3. Tsai, Chieh-Yuan & Chiu, Chuang-Cheng, 2008. "Developing a feature weight self-adjustment mechanism for a K-means clustering algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4658-4672, June.
    4. Anuj Mehrotra & Joseph Shantz & Michael A. Trick, 2005. "Determining newspaper marketing zones using contiguous clustering," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 82-92, February.
    5. Balepur, Prashant Narayan, 1998. "Impacts of Computer-Mediated Communication on Travel and Communication Patterns: The Davis Community Network Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6cb1f85c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Paul Green & Jonathan Kim & Frank Carmone, 1990. "A preliminary study of optimal variable weighting in k-means clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 7(2), pages 271-285, September.
    7. Geert Soete & Wayne DeSarbo & J. Carroll, 1985. "Optimal variable weighting for hierarchical clustering: An alternating least-squares algorithm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 173-192, December.
    8. J. Fernando Vera & Rodrigo Macías, 2021. "On the Behaviour of K-Means Clustering of a Dissimilarity Matrix by Means of Full Multidimensional Scaling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 489-513, June.
    9. A. Gordon, 1990. "Constructing dissimilarity measures," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 7(2), pages 257-269, September.
    10. Golzari Oskouei, Amin & Balafar, Mohammad Ali & Motamed, Cina, 2021. "FKMAWCW: Categorical fuzzy k-modes clustering with automated attribute-weight and cluster-weight learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P1).
    11. Douglas Steinley & Michael Brusco, 2008. "Selection of Variables in Cluster Analysis: An Empirical Comparison of Eight Procedures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 125-144, March.
    12. Maarten M. Kampert & Jacqueline J. Meulman & Jerome H. Friedman, 2017. "rCOSA: A Software Package for Clustering Objects on Subsets of Attributes," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(3), pages 514-547, October.
    13. Wayne DeSarbo & Richard Oliver & Arvind Rangaswamy, 1989. "A simulated annealing methodology for clusterwise linear regression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 707-736, September.
    14. Dolnicar, Sara & Grün, Bettina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2016. "Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 992-999.
    15. Gao, Jinxin & Hitchcock, David B., 2010. "James-Stein shrinkage to improve k-means cluster analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2113-2127, September.
    16. Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "Clustering and meta-envelopment in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 763-778.
    17. J. Fernando Vera & Rodrigo Macías, 2017. "Variance-Based Cluster Selection Criteria in a K-Means Framework for One-Mode Dissimilarity Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 275-294, June.
    18. Stef Buuren & Willem Heiser, 1989. "Clusteringn objects intok groups under optimal scaling of variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 699-706, September.
    19. Myung-Hoe Huh & Yong Lim, 2009. "Weighting variables in K-means clustering," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 67-78.
    20. Douglas L. Steinley, 2016. "Editorial," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 33(2), pages 167-170, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3095-:d:166727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.