IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1631-d147833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is Different about Volunteers? A Study on Factors of Buying Decisions of Products with Recycled Content

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Stoian (Bobâlcă)

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 22 Carol I Street, 700505 Iași, Romania)

  • Oana Țugulea

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 22 Carol I Street, 700505 Iași, Romania)

  • Liviu-George Maha

    (Department of Economics and International Relations, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 22 Carol I Street, 700505 Iași, Romania)

  • Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu

    (Management BMTM, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania)

Abstract

Volunteering is a way to express civic behavior, including pro-environmental behavior such as buying products with recycled content. The purpose of this research is to understand the differences between individuals involved in volunteering activities and individuals who have never been involved in volunteering activities. In order to do this, dimensions are analyzed by categories of public: the general public, individuals involved in volunteering activities (volunteers), and individuals who have never been involved in volunteering activities (non-volunteers). Qualitative methods, based on in-depth interviews; and quantitative methods, based on Anova, Independent Samples T tests, factor analyses, and regression analyses have been combined. The sample included 469 respondents. The general dimensions of buying decisions are: product features, social values, promotions, low risk, uniqueness, and affordable price. The volunteers’ dimensions of buying decisions are product features, social values, uniqueness, benefits, and promotions. The non-volunteers’ dimensions of buying decisions are product features, uniqueness, credibility support, promotions, and low risk. In the conclusions section, implications are presented using specific communication for each of the three public categories, based on important resulting dimensions for each public.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Stoian (Bobâlcă) & Oana Țugulea & Liviu-George Maha & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu, 2018. "What is Different about Volunteers? A Study on Factors of Buying Decisions of Products with Recycled Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1631-:d:147833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cason, Timothy N. & Gangadharan, Lata, 2002. "Environmental Labeling and Incomplete Consumer Information in Laboratory Markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 113-134, January.
    2. Ravi Subramanian & Ramanath Subramanyam, 2012. "Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 315-326, April.
    3. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    4. Stuart Walker & Nick Coleman & Peter Hodgson & Nicola Collins & Louis Brimacombe, 2018. "Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Céline Michaud & Daniel Llerena, 2011. "Green consumer behaviour: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products," Post-Print hal-01809083, HAL.
    6. Wang, Yacan & Hazen, Benjamin T., 2016. "Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 460-469.
    7. Céline Michaud & Daniel Llerena, 2011. "Green consumer behaviour: an experimental analysis of willingness to pay for remanufactured products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 408-420, September.
    8. Igor Martek & M. Reza Hosseini & Asheem Shrestha & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Stewart Seaton, 2018. "The Sustainability Narrative in Contemporary Architecture: Falling Short of Building a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Florin-Alexandru Luca & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Adrian V. Horodnic, 2018. "Raising Awareness on Health Impact of the Chemicals Used in Consumer Products: Empirical Evidence from East-Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Tanhum Yoreh, 2010. "Ultra‐Orthodox recycling narratives: implications for planning and policy," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(4), pages 323-345, October.
    11. Kumar, Bipul & Manrai, Ajay K. & Manrai, Lalita A., 2017. "Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Kai Chen & Ting Deng, 2016. "Research on the Green Purchase Intentions from the Perspective of Product Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Boldureanu & Alina Măriuca Ionescu & Ana-Maria Bercu & Maria Viorica Bedrule-Grigoruță & Daniel Boldureanu, 2020. "Entrepreneurship Education through Successful Entrepreneurial Models in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Dutordoir, Marie, 2020. "Mapping the market for remanufacturing: An application of “Big Data” analytics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Wang, Yacan & Zhu, Quan & Krikke, Harold & Hazen, Benjamin, 2020. "How product and process knowledge enable consumer switching to remanufactured laptop computers in circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Seoyoon Lee & Minjung Kwak, 2020. "Consumer Valuation of Remanufactured Products: A Comparative Study of Product Categories and Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Feng Yang & Yu Wang & Jun Li, 2018. "Consumer familiarity, ambiguity tolerance, and purchase behavior toward remanufactured products: The implications for remanufacturers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1741-1750, December.
    5. Nasiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Shokouhyar, Sajjad, 2021. "Actual consumers' response to purchase refurbished smartphones: Exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Du, Hang & Wei, Lai & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Competition of consumables’ original brand manufacturers and remanufacturers considering the entry of compatible manufacturers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 679-692.
    7. Phantratanamongkol, Supanan & Casalin, Fabrizio & Pang, Gu & Sanderson, Joseph, 2018. "The price-volume relationship for new and remanufactured smartphones," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 78-94.
    8. Kadri G Yilmaz & Sedat Belbag, 2016. "Prediction of Consumer Behavior Regarding Purchasing Remanufactured Products: A Logistics Regression Model," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Atiyeh Seifian & Sajjad Shokouhyar & Mohamad Bahrami, 2024. "Exploring customers’ purchasing behavior toward refurbished mobile phones: a cross-cultural opinion mining of amazon reviews," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28131-28159, November.
    10. Kenichiro Chinen & Mitsutaka Matsumoto, 2021. "Indonesians’ Perceptions of Auto Parts Remanufactured in China: Implications for Global Remanufacturing Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Daan Kabel & Mattias Elg & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Purchasing Behaviour of Remanufactured Robotic Lawn Mowers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2015. "Reprint of “Supply chain-based barriers for truck-engine remanufacturing in China”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 94-108.
    13. Wang, Yacan & Hazen, Benjamin T., 2016. "Consumer product knowledge and intention to purchase remanufactured products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 460-469.
    14. Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liu, Zhi & Jia, Fu & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Coordinating a closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns through variable-weighted Shapley values," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 227-253.
    15. Karthik Murali & Michael K. Lim & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2019. "The Effects of Ecolabels and Environmental Regulation on Green Product Development," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 519-535, July.
    16. De Silva, Muthu & Wang, Pengji & Kuah, Adrian T.H., 2021. "Why wouldn’t green appeal drive purchase intention? Moderation effects of consumption values in the UK and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 713-724.
    17. Juana Camacho-Otero & Casper Boks & Ida Nilstad Pettersen, 2018. "Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Xin Yan & Xiaohua Han, 2022. "Optimal pricing and remanufacturing entry strategies of manufacturers in the presence of online reviews," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 59-92, September.
    19. Li, Wei & Jin, Mingzhou & Galbreth, Michael R., 2024. "Should original equipment manufacturers authorize third-party remanufacturers?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 1013-1028.
    20. Shu-San Gan & I Nyoman Pujawan & Didik Wahjudi & Yopi Yusuf Tanoto, 2019. "Pricing decision model for new and remanufactured short life-cycle products with green consumers," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 376-392, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1631-:d:147833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.