IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1387-d144020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Assessment of the New Residential Projects in the Baltic States: A Multiple Criteria Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Tupenaite

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Arturas Kaklauskas

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Irene Lill

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, School of Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)

  • Ineta Geipele

    (Institute of the Civil Engineering and Real Estate Economics, Department of Civil Construction and Real Estate Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Jurga Naimaviciene

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Loreta Kanapeckiene

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Linda Kauskale

    (Institute of the Civil Engineering and Real Estate Economics, Department of Civil Construction and Real Estate Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Str., LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

Housing is one of the most important public priorities affecting urban development and therefore has a significant impact on sustainable development. A housing project can be regarded as sustainable only when all the dimensions of sustainability (environmental, economic, and social) are dealt with. The aim of the present article is to propose an integrated, hierarchy-based, multiple-criteria approach for the sustainability assessment of new residential development projects, which is achieved through the accomplishment of three objectives. First, this paper proposes an original framework for a multiple-criteria assessment of new residential projects. Second, the proposed methodology is demonstrated in the assessment of nine residential development projects in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia according to a hierarchical system of 53 sustainability indicators developed specifically for the Baltic context. Finally, based on the research results, the paper proposes recommendations to stakeholders for enhancing the performance of new residential projects according to the principles of sustainability. The proposed sustainability assessment approach is not limited to the Baltic States and can also be used in other countries, applying the adapted sustainability assessment indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Tupenaite & Arturas Kaklauskas & Irene Lill & Ineta Geipele & Jurga Naimaviciene & Loreta Kanapeckiene & Linda Kauskale, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of the New Residential Projects in the Baltic States: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1387-:d:144020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1387/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1387/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mulliner, Emma & Smallbone, Kieran & Maliene, Vida, 2013. "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-279.
    2. Jernej Markelj & Manja Kitek Kuzman & Petra Grošelj & Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik, 2014. "A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Chandratilake, S.R. & Dias, W.P.S., 2013. "Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 22-28.
    5. Yu, Wei & Li, Baizhan & Yang, Xincheng & Wang, Qingqin, 2015. "A development of a rating method and weighting system for green store buildings in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 123-129.
    6. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    7. Catalina Turcu, 2013. "Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 695-719, June.
    8. Jeffrey C. Cegan & Ashley M. Filion & Jeffrey M. Keisler & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 123-133, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Tupenaite & Viktorija Zilenaite & Loreta Kanapeckiene & Tomas Gecys & Ineta Geipele, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Modern High-Rise Timber Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Duc Binh Tran & Van Tan Tran & Xuan Anh Pham & Van Tuan Nguyen, 2023. "A General Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Life-Cycle Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak, 2021. "Simple Additive Weighting versus Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution: which method is better suited for assessing the sustainability of a real estate project," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 180-196, June.
    4. Wei Jiang & Wentao Lu Qiu & Sheng-Hau Lin & Huiming Lv & Xiaofeng Zhao & Hao Cong, 2023. "A New Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Promoting Sustainable Social Rental Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Sanchaniya Rashmi Jaymin & Geipele Ineta, 2024. "Impact of Strategical Sustainability on Real Estate Industry’s Sustainability Performance," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 59-66, January.
    6. Maija Kavosa & Inga Lapina & Konstantins Kozlovskis, 2022. "Sustainable Approach to Certification of Persons: Ensuring Reliability and Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski, 2020. "Towards Sustainability in E-Banking Website Assessment Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Jungwon Yoon & Jihye Lee, 2019. "Adaptive Reuse of Apartments as Heritage Assets in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Tayefi Nasrabadi, Mahla & Hataminejad, Hossein, 2021. "Towards residential buildings sustainability in a religious-tourism metropolis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Tupenaite & Irene Lill & Ineta Geipele & Jurga Naimaviciene, 2017. "Ranking of Sustainability Indicators for Assessment of the New Housing Development Projects: Case of the Baltic States," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Ikenna Stephen Ezennia & Sebnem Onal Hoskara, 2019. "Methodological weaknesses in the measurement approaches and concept of housing affordability used in housing research: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Gawlik Remigiusz & Głuszak Michał & Małkowska Agnieszka, 2017. "The Measurement of Housing Preferences in the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 31-43, June.
    5. Brain, Isabel & Prieto, Joaquin, 2021. "Understanding changes in the geography of opportunity over time: the case of Santiago, Chile," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109915, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Ling Gai & Ying Jin & Binyuan Zhang, 2022. "An integrated method for hybrid distribution with estimation of demand matching degree," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2782-2808, November.
    7. Ikenna Stephen Ezennia & Sebnem Onal Hoskara, 2019. "Exploring the Severity of Factors Influencing Sustainable Affordable Housing Choice: Evidence from Abuja, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2020. "How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Madjid Tavana & Tiago Botelho & Konstantinos Chalvatzis, 2020. "A neutrosophic enhanced best–worst method for considering decision-makers’ confidence in the best and worst criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 391-418, June.
    10. Nina Lazar & K. Chithra, 2021. "Comprehensive bibliometric mapping of publication trends in the development of Building Sustainability Assessment Systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4899-4923, April.
    11. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi & Amiri, Maghsoud & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Turskis, Zenonas & Antucheviciene, Jurgita, 2017. "A new hybrid simulation-based assignment approach for evaluating airlines with multiple service quality criteria," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 45-60.
    12. Yelda Ayrim & Kumru Didem Atalay & Gülin Feryal Can, 2018. "A New Stochastic MCDM Approach Based on COPRAS," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 857-882, May.
    13. Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2020. "Development of Weighting Scheme for Indoor Air Quality Model Using a Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    14. Ken’ichi Matsumoto & Yuki Yamamoto & Nao Ohya, 2018. "Effect of Subsidies and Tax Deductions on Promoting the Construction of Long-Life Quality Houses in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, October.
    15. N. Aktaş & N. Demirel, 2021. "A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15591-15618, October.
    16. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    18. Suleyman Enes Hacibektasoglu & Bulent Mertoglu & Hakan Tozan, 2021. "Application of a Novel Hybrid f-SC Risk Analysis Method in the Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    19. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1387-:d:144020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.