IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4852-d191728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Timely Adjustment of the Grazing Prohibition Policy: Ban or Lift? Empirical Research from Local Government Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Lihua Zhou

    (Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Ya Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Guojing Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

As national policy implementers and regional development planners, local government managers have a clearer, more objective and comprehensive understanding of ecological changes than herdsmen. Thus, they have a significant impact on the sustainable development of grassland resources and agricultural and pastoral areas. In this paper, grassland ecological change and related factors in different stages were investigated by means of questionnaires and structured interviews, and the adjustment strategies of grazing prohibition policy were studied. The perception of local government managers was that there was an improvement in grassland ecology, coverage, quality, yield, and in species richness in the early grazing prohibition period. There was, furthermore, an obvious improvement in the intermediate stage and a significant improvement with some degradation in its current stage. The grazing prohibition policy urgently needs to be adjusted according to the management pattern and to the limited time and space. It is necessary to improve the standard of ecological compensation and bolster herdsmen livelihoods, diversification, and non-agriculturalization. Based on the non-equilibrium theory and polycentric governance, the multi-central grassland governance and control system should be created in future.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihua Zhou & Ya Wang & Guojing Yang, 2018. "Study on the Timely Adjustment of the Grazing Prohibition Policy: Ban or Lift? Empirical Research from Local Government Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4852-:d:191728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong Chen & Lihua Zhou, 2016. "Farmers’ Perception of the Decade-Long Grazing Ban Policy in Northern China: A Case Study of Yanchi County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Ya Wang & Lihua Zhou, 2016. "Assessment of the Coordination Ability of Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems Development Based on a Set Pair Analysis: A Case Study in Yanchi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Ning Liu & Lihua Zhou & J Scott Hauger, 2013. "How Sustainable Is Government-Sponsored Desertification Rehabilitation in China? Behavior of Households to Changes in Environmental Policies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-8, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caixia Hou & Mengmeng Zhang & Mengmeng Wang & Hanliang Fu & Mengjie Zhang, 2021. "Factors Influencing Grazing Behavior by Using the Consciousness-Context-Behavior Theory—A Case Study from Yanchi County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Xiujuan Zhang & Yuting Zhao & Kexin Ma & Danni Wang & Huilong Lin, 2022. "The Trend of Grassland Restoration and Its Driving Forces in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China from 1988 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Yang Yongchun & Sun Yan & Wang Weiwei, 2019. "Research on Tibetan Folk’s Contemporary Tibetan Cultural Adaptive Differences and Its Influencing Factors—Taking ShigatseCity, Tibet, China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi Yang & Xingwei Chen, 2021. "Using a combined evaluation method to assess water resources sustainable utilization in Fujian Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 8047-8061, May.
    2. Rui Meng & Lirong Zhang & Hongkuan Zang & Shichao Jin, 2021. "Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Integrated Benefits of Photovoltaic Poverty Alleviation Technology in the Sanjiangyuan Region of Qinghai Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Xiaodong Yang & Yongxiang Wu & Hang Dang, 2017. "Urban Land Use Efficiency and Coordination in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Ya Wang & Lihua Zhou, 2016. "Assessment of the Coordination Ability of Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems Development Based on a Set Pair Analysis: A Case Study in Yanchi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Zheng-Hong Kong & Lindsay Stringer & Jouni Paavola & Qi Lu, 2021. "Situating China in the Global Effort to Combat Desertification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Yang Li & Xiaotong Zhang & Xiuxiu Gao, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Coupling Coordination Degree of an Urban Economy–Society–Environment System Based on a Multi-Scenario Analysis: The Case of Chengde City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Jing Guo & Jun Ren & Xiaotao Huang & Guifang He & Yan Shi & Huakun Zhou, 2020. "The Dynamic Evolution of the Ecological Footprint and Ecological Capacity of Qinghai Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Rong Li & Rui Han & Qianru Yu & Shuang Qi & Luo Guo, 2020. "Spatial Heterogeneous of Ecological Vulnerability in Arid and Semi-Arid Area: A Case of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Jiayi Sun & Deqing Tan, 2023. "Non-cooperative Mode, Cost-Sharing Mode, or Cooperative Mode: Which is the Optimal Mode for Desertification Control?," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 975-1008, March.
    10. Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Jr. Florendo Aala & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2022. "Is Implementing a Biotech Ban Correct or Not? Analysis of Farmer Perceptions and Attitudes on the Philippine Supreme Court’s Ban on Biotech Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Jue Wang & Haiwei Jiang & Yuan He, 2023. "Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Yaru Chen & Xiao Han & Siyao Lv & Boyao Song & Xinye Zhang & Hongxun Li, 2022. "The Influencing Factors of Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Farmer Households Participating in Understory Economy: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Ruxue Shi & Pingtao Yi & Weiwei Li & Lu Wang, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Autonomous Regions in China Using GRA-SPA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Jingyu Wang & Wei Liu & Fanbing Kong, 2023. "Research on Forest Ecological Product Value Evaluation and Conversion Efficiency: Case Study from Pearl River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Zhen Liu & Hao Sun & Ke Lin & Cuiying Zhou & Wei Huang, 2021. "Occurrence Regularity of Silt–Clay Minerals in Wind Eroded Deserts of Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4852-:d:191728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.