IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4088-d181241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a New Machine for Flower and Fruit Thinning in Stone Fruits

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Assirelli

    (CREA—Centro di ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni, via Della Pascolare, 16, 00016 Monterotondo, Italy)

  • Daniela Giovannini

    (CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy)

  • Mattia Cacchi

    (CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy)

  • Sandro Sirri

    (CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy)

  • Gianluca Baruzzi

    (CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy)

  • Giuseppina Caracciolo

    (CREA—Centro di ricerca Olivicoltura, Frutticoltura e Agrumicoltura, via la Canapona 1 bis, 47121 Forlì, Italy)

Abstract

Peach and apricot trees usually set more fruit than they can adequately support. Crop load adjustment through fruit thinning is a routine practice adopted by fruit growers to obtain a marketable product. However, hand thinning is an expensive, labor-intense operation. The interest in the mechanization of thinning has increased in the last decades. A new machine, consisting of a tractor-mounted rotor equipped with elastic rods radially inserted on a central axis, has been recently developed to thin both flowers and green fruits in stone fruit crops. In order to test its effectiveness and optimize the operative conditions, trials were carried out in 2016 in two apricot and two peach commercial orchards located in the northeast Italy. Tests were carried out on narrow-canopied orchards, during blooming time, and on green fruit, assessing the flower and fruit removal percentage and the labor saving as compared with the standard fruit hand-thinning practice. In apricot, the machine removed 20.8% of flowers and 43.6% of fruit, allowing 48% time saving in the follow-up fruit manual thinning as compared with the control (hand-thinning only). In peach, mechanical thinning at blooming time removed 63% of flowers, allowing 42.4% time saving in the follow-up fruit manual thinning as compared with the control, whereas mechanical thinning of fruit at the beginning of pit hardening stage removed less than 10%. The development of a mechanical thinning practice, complemented by a manual finishing, could represent a valuable near-term solution to reduce thinning labor time.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Assirelli & Daniela Giovannini & Mattia Cacchi & Sandro Sirri & Gianluca Baruzzi & Giuseppina Caracciolo, 2018. "Evaluation of a New Machine for Flower and Fruit Thinning in Stone Fruits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4088-:d:181241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Assirelli & Elio Romano & Carlo Bisaglia & Enrico Maria Lodolini & Davide Neri & Massimo Brambilla, 2021. "Canopy Index Evaluation for Precision Management in an Intensive Olive Orchard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Alberto Assirelli & Giuseppina Caracciolo & Giancarlo Roccuzzo & Fiorella Stagno, 2021. "New Tools for Mechanical Thinning of Apricot Fruitlets," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4088-:d:181241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.