IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v4y2021i4p50-867d659763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Articulating Spatial Statistics and Spatial Optimization Relationships: Expanding the Relevance of Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel A. Griffith

    (School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA)

Abstract

Both historically and in terms of practiced academic organization, the anticipation should be that a flourishing synergistic interface exists between statistics and operations research in general, and between spatial statistics/econometrics and spatial optimization in particular. Unfortunately, for the most part, this expectation is false. The purpose of this paper is to address this existential missing link by focusing on the beneficial contributions of spatial statistics to spatial optimization, via spatial autocorrelation (i.e., dis/similar attribute values tend to cluster together on a map), in order to encourage considerably more future collaboration and interaction between contributors to their two parent bodies of knowledge. The key basic statistical concept in this pursuit is the median in its bivariate form, with special reference to the global and to sets of regional spatial medians. One-dimensional examples illustrate situations that the narrative then extends to two-dimensional illustrations, which, in turn, connects these treatments to the spatial statistics centrography theme. Because of computational time constraints (reported results include some for timing experiments), the summarized analysis restricts attention to problems involving one global and two or three regional spatial medians. The fundamental and foundational spatial, statistical, conceptual tool employed here is spatial autocorrelation: geographically informed sampling designs—which acknowledge a non-random mixture of geographic demand weight values that manifests itself as local, homogeneous, spatial clusters of these values—can help spatial optimization techniques determine the spatial optima, at least for location-allocation problems. A valuable discovery by this study is that existing but ignored spatial autocorrelation latent in georeferenced demand point weights undermines spatial optimization algorithms. All in all, this paper should help initiate a dissipation of the existing isolation between statistics and operations research, hopefully inspiring substantially more collaborative work by their professionals in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel A. Griffith, 2021. "Articulating Spatial Statistics and Spatial Optimization Relationships: Expanding the Relevance of Statistics," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:4:y:2021:i:4:p:50-867:d:659763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/4/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/4/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Wang & Wenzhong Shi & Zelang Miao, 2015. "Confidence Analysis of Standard Deviational Ellipse and Its Extension into Higher Dimensional Euclidean Space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Daniel Griffith, 2003. "Using Estimated Missing Spatial Data with the 2-Median Model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 233-247, September.
    3. Daniel Griffith & Yongwan Chun, 2015. "Spatial Autocorrelation in Spatial Interactions Models: Geographic Scale and Resolution Implications for Network Resilience and Vulnerability," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 337-365, June.
    4. Olkin, Ingram & Trikalinos, Thomas A., 2015. "Constructions for a bivariate beta distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 54-60.
    5. Richard L. Church & Alan Murray, 2018. "Location Covering Models," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-99846-6, February.
    6. Daniel A. Griffith, 2020. "A Family of Correlated Observations: From Independent to Strongly Interrelated Ones," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Chen, L. -A. & Welsh, A. H., 2002. "Distribution-Function-Based Bivariate Quantiles," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 208-231, October.
    8. C. D. Hyson & W. P. Hyson, 1950. "The Economic Law of Market Areas," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(2), pages 319-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel A. Griffith & Manfred M. Fischer & James LeSage, 2017. "The spatial autocorrelation problem in spatial interaction modelling: a comparison of two common solutions," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 75-86, March.
    2. Fei Tao & Guoan Tang & Yihao Wu & Tong Zhou, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Driving Mechanism of Co-Ordinated Urban Development: A Case Study of the Central Area of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Daniel A. Griffith, 2023. "Understanding Spatial Autocorrelation: An Everyday Metaphor and Additional New Interpretations," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Jiwon Baik & Alan T. Murray, 2022. "Locating a facility to simultaneously address access and coverage goals," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1199-1217, October.
    5. Daniel Griffith & Yongwan Chun, 2015. "Spatial Autocorrelation in Spatial Interactions Models: Geographic Scale and Resolution Implications for Network Resilience and Vulnerability," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 337-365, June.
    6. Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows: Model and algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 32-51.
    7. David Meintrup & Chang Woon Nam, 2009. "Shadow Market Area for Air Pollutants," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(4), pages 664-681, August.
    8. Yafang Bao & Hanjing Jiang & Emily Ma & Zhi Sun & Lihua Xu, 2022. "A Longitudinal Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Ancient Village Tourism Development in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. John B. Parr, 1995. "Alternative Approaches to Market-area Structure in the Urban System," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(8), pages 1317-1329, August.
    10. Carlos García-Alonso & Leonor Pérez-Naranjo & Juan Fernández-Caballero, 2014. "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to identify highly autocorrelated areas: the case of spatial distribution in financially compromised farms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 187-202, August.
    11. Andreas Rauh & Stefan Wirtensohn & Patrick Hoher & Johannes Reuter & Luc Jaulin, 2022. "Reliability Assessment of an Unscented Kalman Filter by Using Ellipsoidal Enclosure Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Gianandrea Lanzara & Matteo Santacesaria, 2021. "Market Areas in General Equilibrium," Papers 2110.15849, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    13. John Östh & Martina Dolciotti & Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Social Capital, Resilience and Accessibility in Urban Systems: a Study on Sweden," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 313-336, June.
    14. Oscar Lopez Jaramillo & Joel Rinebold & Michael Kuby & Scott Kelley & Darren Ruddell & Rhian Stotts & Aimee Krafft & Elizabeth Wentz, 2021. "Hydrogen Station Location Planning via Geodesign in Connecticut: Comparing Optimization Models and Structured Stakeholder Collaboration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Klapka, Pavel & Kraft, Stanislav & Halás, Marián, 2020. "Network based definition of functional regions: A graph theory approach for spatial distribution of traffic flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Kamila Borsekova & Samuel Koróny & Peter Nijkamp, 2022. "In Search of Concerted Strategies for Competitive and Resilient Regions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 607-634, September.
    17. Oshan, Taylor M., 2020. "The spatial structure debate in spatial interaction modeling: 50 years on," OSF Preprints 42vxn, Center for Open Science.
    18. Junnan Xiong & Chongchong Ye & Weiming Cheng & Liang Guo & Chenghu Zhou & Xiaolei Zhang, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution of Flash Floods and Analysis of Partition Driving Forces in Yunnan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Tan Chen & Shulin Deng & Manchun Li, 2018. "Spatial Patterns of Satellite-Retrieved PM 2.5 and Long-Term Exposure Assessment of China from 1998 to 2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Isabel Pilar Albaladejo Pina, 1995. "Cinco líneas metodológicas para la delimitación de las áreas de mercado," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 4, pages 5-27, Diciembre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:4:y:2021:i:4:p:50-867:d:659763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.