IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v2y2018i1p1-14d191866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cronbach’s Alpha under Insufficient Effort Responding: An Analytic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen W. Carden

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Trevor R. Camper

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Nicholas S. Holtzman

    (Department of Psychology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA)

Abstract

Surveys commonly suffer from insufficient effort responding (IER). If not accounted for, IER can cause biases and lead to false conclusions. In particular, Cronbach’s alpha has been empirically observed to either deflate or inflate due to IER. This paper will elucidate how IER impacts Cronbach’s alpha in a variety of situations. Previous results concerning internal consistency under mixture models are extended to obtain a characterization of Cronbach’s alpha in terms of item validities, average variances, and average covariances. The characterization is then applied to contaminating distributions representing various types of IER. The discussion will provide commentary on previous simulation-based investigations, confirming some previous hypotheses for the common types of IER, but also revealing possibilities from newly considered responding patterns. Specifically, it is possible that the bias can change from negative to positive (and vice versa) as the proportion of contamination increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen W. Carden & Trevor R. Camper & Nicholas S. Holtzman, 2018. "Cronbach’s Alpha under Insufficient Effort Responding: An Analytic Approach," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:1-14:d:191866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/2/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/2/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. G. Kuder & M. Richardson, 1937. "The theory of the estimation of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 2(3), pages 151-160, September.
    3. Klaas Sijtsma, 2009. "On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 107-120, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zaneta Chatys-Bogacka & Iwona Mazurkiewicz & Joanna Slowik & Monika Bociaga-Jasik & Anna Dzieza-Grudnik & Agnieszka Slowik & Marcin Wnuk & Leszek Drabik, 2022. "Brain Fog and Quality of Life at Work in Non-Hospitalized Patients after COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaas Sijtsma & Julius M. Pfadt, 2021. "Part II: On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha: Discussing Lower Bounds and Correlated Errors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 843-860, December.
    2. Eunseong Cho, 2021. "Neither Cronbach’s Alpha nor McDonald’s Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 877-886, December.
    3. Adam Pawlewicz & Wojciech Gotkiewicz & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Paweł Kluczek, 2022. "Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Jiang, Jingxian & Ellis, Gary D. & Ettekal, Andrea V. & Nelson, Chad, 2022. "Situational engagement experiences: Measurement options and theory testing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 223-236.
    5. Gilles E. Gignac & Elizabeth Ooi, 2022. "Measurement error in research on financial literacy: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 938-956, June.
    6. María Vera & José A. Cortés, 2021. "Emotional and Cognitive Aptitudes and Successful Academic Performance: Using the ECCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ronald Armstrong & Douglas Jones & Ing-Long Wu, 1992. "An automated test development of parallel tests from a seed test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 271-288, June.
    8. Érika Martins Silva Ramos & Cecilia Jakobsson Bergstad, 2021. "The Psychology of Sharing: Multigroup Analysis among Users and Non-Users of Carsharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Mohammad Abu-Zaineh & Maame Esi Woode, 2018. "Investigating the Dimensions of Youth Wellbeing: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach Applied to Palestine," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, February.
    10. Samuel Lyerly, 1958. "The Kuder-Richardson formula (21) as a split-half coefficient, and some remarks on its basic assumption," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(3), pages 267-270, September.
    11. Mary F. Zhang & Julie Selwyn, 2020. "The Subjective Well-Being of Children and Young People in out of Home Care: Psychometric Analyses of the “Your Life, your Care” Survey," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1549-1572, October.
    12. Melvin Novick & Charles Lewis, 1967. "Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Wang, Selena & De Boeck, Paul, 2020. "When high reliability does not signal reliable detection of experimental effects," OSF Preprints gz8pw, Center for Open Science.
    14. Adzor Ibiamke & Clement C. M. Ajekwe, 2017. "On Ensuring Rigour in Accounting Research," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(3), pages 157-170, July.
    15. A. Srivastava & Harold Webster, 1967. "An estimation of true scores in the case of items scored on a continuous scale," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(3), pages 327-338, September.
    16. Fernanda Maria Rovai Bado & Flávio Rebustini & Lisa Jamieson & Karine Laura Cortellazzi & Fábio Luiz Mialhe, 2018. "Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Literacy Assessment in Spanish and development of a shortened form of the instrument," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Rosinger, Asher Y., 2018. "Household water insecurity after a historic flood: Diarrhea and dehydration in the Bolivian Amazon," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 192-202.
    18. Erik Meijer & Edward Oczkowski & Tom Wansbeek, 2021. "How measurement error affects inference in linear regression," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 131-155, January.
    19. Inna Reddy Edara & Fides del Castillo & Gregory Siy Ching & Clarence Darro del Castillo, 2021. "Religiosity, Emotions, Resilience, and Wellness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of Taiwanese University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Tyler Hunt & Peter Bentler, 2015. "Quantile Lower Bounds to Reliability Based on Locally Optimal Splits," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 182-195, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:1-14:d:191866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.