IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v6y2016i3p20-d74372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First Application of Robot Teaching in an Existing Industry 4.0 Environment: Does It Really Work?

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Weiss

    (Automation and Control Institute, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Andreas Huber

    (Automation and Control Institute, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jürgen Minichberger

    (PROFACTOR GmbH, 4407 Steyr, Austria)

  • Markus Ikeda

    (PROFACTOR GmbH, 4407 Steyr, Austria)

Abstract

This article reports three case studies on the usability and acceptance of an industrial robotic prototype in the context of human-robot cooperation. The three case studies were conducted in the framework of a two-year project named AssistMe, which aims at developing different means of interaction for programming and using collaborative robots in a user-centered manner. Together with two industrial partners and a technological partner, two different application scenarios were implemented and studied with an off-the-shelf robotic system. The operators worked with the robotic prototype in laboratory conditions (two days), in a factory context (one day) and in an automotive assembly line (three weeks). In the article, the project and procedures are described in detail, including the quantitative and qualitative methodology. Our results show that close human-robot cooperation in the industrial context needs adaptive pacing mechanisms in order to avoid a change of working routines for the operators and that an off-the-shelf robotic system is still limited in terms of usability and acceptance. The touch panel, which is needed for controlling the robot, had a negative impact on the overall user experience. It creates a further intermediate layer between the user, the robot and the work piece and potentially leads to a decrease in productivity. Finally, the fear of the worker of being replaced by an improved robotic system was regularly expressed and adds an additional anthropocentric dimension to the discussion of human-robot cooperation, smart factories and the upcoming Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Weiss & Andreas Huber & Jürgen Minichberger & Markus Ikeda, 2016. "First Application of Robot Teaching in an Existing Industry 4.0 Environment: Does It Really Work?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:6:y:2016:i:3:p:20-:d:74372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/3/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/3/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2021. "Technology Acceptance and Leadership 4.0: A Quali-Quantitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2020. "The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:6:y:2016:i:3:p:20-:d:74372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.