IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i1p11-d1566353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Academic Integrity: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Framework to Address and Prevent Contract Cheating

Author

Listed:
  • Deepani B. Guruge

    (Melbourne Institute of Technology (MIT), School of IT and Engineering (SITE), Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Rajan Kadel

    (Melbourne Institute of Technology (MIT), School of IT and Engineering (SITE), Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Samar Shailendra

    (Melbourne Institute of Technology (MIT), School of IT and Engineering (SITE), Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Aakanksha Sharma

    (Melbourne Institute of Technology (MIT), School of IT and Engineering (SITE), Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

Academic integrity is a cornerstone of education systems, yet the rise of contract cheating poses significant challenges for higher education institutions. Current approaches to managing contract cheating often lack the comprehensive structure needed to address the complexities of modern cheating methods. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed Three-Tier Framework (TTF), designed in our previous study to combat contract cheating. The proposed framework comprises three tiers: awareness, monitoring, and evaluation. It engages stakeholders within the system and encourages a proactive and collaborative stance against contract cheating while reinforcing a culture of academic honesty. The evaluation focuses on three key aspects: the clarity of the framework’s functions and objectives, the potential challenges in implementing the proposed monitoring process, and the perceived limitations in detecting and mitigating contract cheating through this framework. Supervised and unsupervised assignments are considered, excluding the option of e-proctoring, as some students encountered difficulties setting up necessary tools and software for online exams. Survey results reveal a broad consensus among respondents, who expressed strong confidence in the clarity and effectiveness of the framework and its monitoring procedures. These positive perceptions were consistent across respondents, regardless of their prior experience or familiarity with contract cheating. Although the overall feedback was positive, concerns were raised regarding implementing the framework in current educational settings. Specific challenges cited include tight timelines and the increased workload associated with the new procedures, emphasising a need for additional guidance, training, and institutional support to ensure effective adoption. The proposed framework incorporates an instructor dashboard designed to streamline academic workflow and simplify the monitoring process introduced in this framework. The survey results confirm that the framework can be adopted to address the unique needs of academics and diverse educational environments; however further research is needed to explore its applicability across the broader higher education community.

Suggested Citation

  • Deepani B. Guruge & Rajan Kadel & Samar Shailendra & Aakanksha Sharma, 2025. "Building Academic Integrity: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Framework to Address and Prevent Contract Cheating," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:11-:d:1566353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:11-:d:1566353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.