IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i12p259-d1536110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Training in Co-Creation as a Methodological Approach to Improve AI Fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Slesinger

    (Trilateral Research, London SW1X 7QA, UK)

  • Evren Yalaz

    (Trilateral Research, London SW1X 7QA, UK)

  • Stavroula Rizou

    (Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Marta Gibin

    (Department of Sociology and Economic Law, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Emmanouil Krasanakis

    (Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thermi, Greece)

  • Symeon Papadopoulos

    (Centre for Research & Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001 Thermi, Greece)

Abstract

Participatory design (PD) and co-creation (Co-C) approaches to building Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have become increasingly popular exercises for ensuring greater social inclusion and fairness in technological transformation by accounting for the experiences of vulnerable or disadvantaged social groups; however, such design work is challenging in practice, partly because of the inaccessible domain of technical expertise inherent to AI design. This paper evaluates a methodological approach to make addressing AI bias more accessible by incorporating a training component on AI bias in a Co-C process with vulnerable and marginalized participant groups. This was applied by socio-technical researchers involved in creating an AI bias mitigation developer toolkit. This paper’s analysis emphasizes that critical reflection on how to use training in Co-C appropriately and how such training should be designed and implemented is necessary to ensure training allows for a genuinely more inclusive approach to AI systems design when those most at risk of being adversely affected by AI technologies are often not the intended end-users of said technologies. This is acutely relevant as Co-C exercises are increasingly used to demonstrate regulatory compliance and ethical practice by powerful institutions and actors developing AI systems, particularly in the ethical and regulatory environment coalescing around the European Union’s recent AI Act.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Slesinger & Evren Yalaz & Stavroula Rizou & Marta Gibin & Emmanouil Krasanakis & Symeon Papadopoulos, 2024. "Training in Co-Creation as a Methodological Approach to Improve AI Fairness," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:259-:d:1536110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/12/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:259-:d:1536110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.