IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2020i1p17-d317873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual Citizenship Theory and Employment Discrimination among Transgender-Identified People

Author

Listed:
  • Gina R. Rosich

    (Department of Social Work and Equitable Community Practice, University of Saint Joseph, 1678 Asylum Ave Rm 219, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA)

Abstract

Employment discrimination remains a consistent and widespread concern among transgender and gender non-conforming (GNC) people. A secondary data analysis was conducted using the Transgender Law Center California Economic Health Survey (n = 646). The aim of this study was to examine workplace discrimination among transgender and gender non-conforming adults. Sexual citizenship theory informed both the grouping of variables and analysis of findings. Bivariate, multivariate, and multivariable statistical tests were conducted to examine problems related to hiring and to various forms of workplace harassment. Analyses revealed that about 67% of respondents reported some kind of workplace mistreatment. Trans men (FtM) were 132.6% more likely to report discrimination in the workplace (chiefly misgendering and privacy breach), while trans women (MtF) were more likely to experience a wider variety of types of discrimination. Respondents out to their co-workers were 292.4% more likely to experiences discrimination. Those with higher income were less likely to need assistance with changing IDs and more likely to pass/blend. Those who were less likely to pass/blend faced higher unemployment. These findings underscore the many ways in which transphobia, cis gender entitlement and transmisogyny shape the lives of trans people and prohibit full citizenship participation in society vis-à-vis the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Gina R. Rosich, 2020. "Sexual Citizenship Theory and Employment Discrimination among Transgender-Identified People," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:17-:d:317873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/1/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/1/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:17-:d:317873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.