IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i4p55-d348334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Sis Science’ and Fitness Doping: Ethnopharmacology, Gender and Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen Sverkersson

    (Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82 Kalmar, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden)

  • Jesper Andreasson

    (Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82 Kalmar, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden)

  • Thomas Johansson

    (Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Box 300, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden)

Abstract

This article is part of a larger investigation looking into recent changes in the demographics of fitness doping and the possible consequences of such changes. Contesting the historical alliance between masculinity and fitness doping, the article focuses on women’s narratives and experiences of fitness doping in a male-dominated open online community called Flashback . The article builds upon a qualitative and netnographic approach to the research. Employing the lens of the potential emergence of a woman-based ethnopharmacological culture, this article investigates the ways in which women talk about and rationalise their use of performance and image enhancing drugs (PEIDs), their potency and potential gendered side-effects. The results show that although fitness doping can be largely understood in terms of hegemonic patterns, women have gained ground in the context of online fitness doping, heralding a changing doping demography and a movement towards a ‘sis science’ ethnopharmacology. Although critiqued by men, the context enables women to freely discuss harm reduction, risks and the potential potencies of various drugs, and to share knowledge that is relevant to female biology and discuss their own experiences, an activity that also makes visible the negotiation of new gender positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen Sverkersson & Jesper Andreasson & Thomas Johansson, 2020. "‘Sis Science’ and Fitness Doping: Ethnopharmacology, Gender and Risk," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:55-:d:348334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/55/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/55/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monaghan, Lee F., 2002. "Vocabularies of motive for illicit steroid use among bodybuilders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 695-708, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesper Andreasson & Thomas Johansson, 2016. "Gender, Fitness Doping and the Genetic Max. The Ambivalent Construction of Muscular Masculinities in an Online Community," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Peretti-Watel, Patrick & Moatti, Jean-Paul, 2006. "Understanding risk behaviours: How the sociology of deviance may contribute? The case of drug-taking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 675-679, August.
    3. Fraser, Suzanne & Fomiatti, Renae & Moore, David & Seear, Kate & Aitken, Campbell, 2020. "Is another relationship possible? Connoisseurship and the doctor–patient relationship for men who consume performance and image-enhancing drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Heikkinen, Hanne & Patja, Kristiina & Jallinoja, Piia, 2010. "Smokers' accounts on the health risks of smoking: Why is smoking not dangerous for me?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 877-883, September.
    5. Andrews, Gavin J. & Sudwell, Mark I. & Sparkes, Andrew C., 2005. "Towards a geography of fitness: an ethnographic case study of the gym in British bodybuilding culture," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 877-891, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:55-:d:348334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.