IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i11p192-d436100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing the Mother Tac: The Racialised, Sexualised and Gendered Politics of Modern Slavery in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • P. G. Macioti

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK)

  • Eurydice Aroney

    (Department of Journalism, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Calum Bennachie

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK)

  • Anne E. Fehrenbacher

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK
    Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA)

  • Calogero Giametta

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK
    Department of Sociology, LAMES, Aix-Marseille University, 13007 Marseille, France)

  • Heidi Hoefinger

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK
    Department of Political Science, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, NY 10019, USA
    Department of Science, Berkeley College, New York, NY 10017, USA)

  • Nicola Mai

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK)

  • Jennifer Musto

    (Department of Criminology and Sociology, Kingston University, London KT1 2EE, UK
    Department of Women’s and Gender Studies, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA)

Abstract

Centred on the slavery trial “Crown vs. Rungnapha Kanbut” heard in Sydney, New South Wales, between 10 April and 15 May 2019, this article seeks to frame the figure of the “Mother Tac” or the “mother of contract”, also called “mama tac” or “mae tac”—a term used amongst Thai migrants to describe a woman who hosts, collects debts from, and organises work for Thai migrant sex workers in their destination country. It proposes that this largely unexplored figure has come to assume a disproportionate role in the “modern slavery” approach to human trafficking, with its emphasis on absolute victims and individual offenders. The harms suffered by Kanbut’s victims are put into context by referring to existing literature on women accused of trafficking; interviews with Thai migrant sex workers, including Kanbut’s primary victim, and with members from the Australian Federal Police Human Trafficking Unit; and ethnographic field notes. The article unveils how constructions of both victim and offender, as well as definitions of slavery, are racialised, gendered, and sexualised and rely on the victims’ subjective accounts of bounded exploitation. By documenting these and other limitations involved in a criminal justice approach, the authors reveal its shortfalls. For instance, while harsh sentences are meant as a deterrence to others, the complex and structural roots of migrant labour exploitation remain unaffected. This research finds that improved legal migration pathways, the decriminalisation of the sex industry, and improved access to information and support for migrant sex workers are key to reducing heavier forms of labour exploitation, including human trafficking, in the Australian sex industry.

Suggested Citation

  • P. G. Macioti & Eurydice Aroney & Calum Bennachie & Anne E. Fehrenbacher & Calogero Giametta & Heidi Hoefinger & Nicola Mai & Jennifer Musto, 2020. "Framing the Mother Tac: The Racialised, Sexualised and Gendered Politics of Modern Slavery in Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:192-:d:436100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/11/192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/11/192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicola Mai, 2016. "‘Too Much Suffering’: Understanding the Interplay between Migration, Bounded Exploitation and Trafficking through Nigerian Sex Workers’ Experiences," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 159-172, November.
    2. Sine Plambech, 2017. "Sex, Deportation and Rescue: Economies of Migration among Nigerian Sex Workers," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 134-159, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Calum Bennachie & Annah Pickering & Jenny Lee & P. G. Macioti & Nicola Mai & Anne E. Fehrenbacher & Calogero Giametta & Heidi Hoefinger & Jennifer Musto, 2021. "Unfinished Decriminalization: The Impact of Section 19 of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003 on Migrant Sex Workers’ Rights and Lives in Aotearoa New Zealand," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Backus & Thien Nguyen, 2021. "The Effect of the Sex Buyer Law on the Market for Sex, Sexual Health and Sexual Violence," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2106, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    2. Jane Freedman & Nina Sahraoui & Elsa Tyszler, 2022. "Asylum, Racism, and the Structural Production of Sexual Violence against Racialised Women in Exile in Paris," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Michela Semprebon, 2024. "Protecting Protection Programmes or Engaging with People? Conditional Inclusion and Evolving Relational Dynamics in Anti-Trafficking Programmes," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Heidi Hoefinger & Jennifer Musto & P. G. Macioti & Anne E. Fehrenbacher & Nicola Mai & Calum Bennachie & Calogero Giametta, 2019. "Community-Based Responses to Negative Health Impacts of Sexual Humanitarian Anti-Trafficking Policies and the Criminalization of Sex Work and Migration in the US," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:192-:d:436100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.