IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i7p212-d246616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration in the Shadow of Austerity—Refugees in Newcastle upon Tyne

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Flug

    (Hub Drop-in for Asylum Seekers and Refugees, Newcastle NE4 6NX, UK)

  • Jason Hussein

    (Hub Drop-in for Asylum Seekers and Refugees, Newcastle NE4 6NX, UK)

Abstract

Newcastle upon Tyne, a post-industrial city in the North East of England, has long been committed to hosting refugees. Although the city has suffered drastic cuts in government funding and faces high levels of deprivation, Newcastle declared itself a city of sanctuary and participates in several dispersal schemes for asylum seekers and refugees. This paper shows how political support as well as the self-motivating ambition to be a city of sanctuary are driving forces behind the city’s commitment to hosting refugees. This study then proceeds to explore the integration experiences of refugees in Newcastle, with a focus on housing, employment and the relations between refugees and local residents. While an overall positive picture emerges across these areas, language barriers, the refusal to accept refugees’ previous qualifications and experiences of racism remain major obstacles to integration. Moreover, the gulf in funding and support between resettled refugees and former asylum seekers greatly aggravates the latter’s access to housing and employment and contributes to a lower feeling of safety among this group.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Flug & Jason Hussein, 2019. "Integration in the Shadow of Austerity—Refugees in Newcastle upon Tyne," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:7:p:212-:d:246616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/7/212/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/7/212/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rianne Dekker & Henrik Emilsson & Bernhard Krieger & Peter Scholten, 2015. "A Local Dimension of Integration Policies? A Comparative Study of Berlin, Malmö, and Rotterdam," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 633-658, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michelle L James, 2021. "Can Community-Based Social Protection Interventions Improve the Wellbeing of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the United Kingdom? A Systematic Qualitative Meta-Aggregation Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asya Pisarevskaya & Peter Scholten & Zeynep Kaşlı, 2022. "Classifying the Diversity of Urban Diversities: an Inductive Analysis of European Cities," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 655-677, June.
    2. Robert Barbarino & Charlotte Räuchle & Wolfgang Scholz, 2021. "Migration-Led Institutional Change in Urban Development and Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-6.
    3. Henrik Emilsson & Klara Öberg, 2022. "Housing for Refugees in Sweden: Top-Down Governance and its Local Reactions," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 613-631, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:7:p:212-:d:246616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.