IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i12p256-d188317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Representations in Studying Information, Knowledge, and Mediations: A Critical Review

Author

Listed:
  • Rainer Rubira-García

    (Department of Communication Sciences and Sociology, King Juan Carlos University, 28943 Madrid, Spain)

  • Belén Puebla-Martínez

    (Department of Communication Sciences and Sociology, King Juan Carlos University, 28943 Madrid, Spain)

  • Roberto Gelado-Marcos

    (Department of Journalism, CEU San Pablo University, 28003 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This text addresses the concept of social representations, as well as its uses and epistemological limits in the processes of production, distribution, and appropriation of information and knowledge. From a critical and systematic documentary–bibliographical analysis, this paper aims at shedding light on the conditions of emergency and functioning of social representations and their role in building up shared meanings. The article connects objectification and anchoring mechanisms from the formation processes of social representations with strategies of meaning construction, and therefore, of knowledge acquisition, in relation to information exchange in different psychosocial stages. Finally, we aim at trying to reflect on the socio-cultural aspects that shape information and communication phenomena, and the significance of the mediations paradigm in this regard.

Suggested Citation

  • Rainer Rubira-García & Belén Puebla-Martínez & Roberto Gelado-Marcos, 2018. "Social Representations in Studying Information, Knowledge, and Mediations: A Critical Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:12:p:256-:d:188317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/12/256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/12/256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Cuéllar & Maria Teresa Fernandez-Bajón & Felix Moya Anegón, 2024. "A New Approach to Measure Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability: a Case of Study in Emerging Markets," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15418-15446, September.
    2. Orianna Calderon-Sandoval & Adelina Sanchez-Espinosa, 2019. "Feminist Documentary Cinema as a Diffraction Apparatus: A Diffractive Reading of the Spanish Films, Cuidado, resbala and Yes, We Fuck!," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:12:p:256-:d:188317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.