IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v6y2017i2p62-d101277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity in a Nationwide Sample of Greek Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Ntina Kourmousi

    (Primary Education Directorate of Eastern Attica, Glyka Nera 15454, Greece)

  • Eirini Amanaki

    (Faculty of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 10680, Greece)

  • Chara Tzavara

    (Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece)

  • Kyriakoula Merakou

    (National School of Public Health, 196 Alexandras Ave., Athens 11521, Greece)

  • Anastasia Barbouni

    (National School of Public Health, 196 Alexandras Ave., Athens 11521, Greece)

  • Vasilios Koutras

    (Early Childhood Education, University of Ioannina, P.O. Box 1186, Ioannina 45110, Greece)

Abstract

The present study examined the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire’s (TEQ) validity and reliability in a sample of 3955 Greek teachers. In order to test the internal consistency reliability, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used and was found satisfactory at 0.72. The sample was randomly split and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted in the even subsample, justifying the one-factor solution, with the only discrepancy of the low loading of an item. In the odd subsample a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to confirm the one-factor model identified by the EFA. The chi square test (χ 2 ) of the model was significant ( p < 0.05), while the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the goodness of fit index (GFI) values were 0.078, 0.969 and 0.960, respectively, further supporting the model’s fit. Student’s t -tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that women, teachers with children of their own, those working full-time in public schools, those with students who needed special education, and those who had received mental health promotion training, scored higher. Additionally, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that sex, working status, having students who needed special education, and having attended mental health training courses were independently associated with TEQ score. The analyses confirmed that the Greek version of TEQ could be used for researches in Greek educators as a valid and reliable measure of teachers’ empathy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ntina Kourmousi & Eirini Amanaki & Chara Tzavara & Kyriakoula Merakou & Anastasia Barbouni & Vasilios Koutras, 2017. "The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity in a Nationwide Sample of Greek Teachers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:2:p:62-:d:101277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/2/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/2/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:2:p:62-:d:101277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.