IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i4p198-d1619327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian Value or Political Rhetoric? The Media’s Use of the Fair Go in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Ashleigh Marie Pantaleo

    (School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia)

  • Matthew James Phillips

    (School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia)

  • Antonia Hendrick

    (School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth 6847, Australia)

  • Brian Bishop

    (School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia)

Abstract

Deceivingly simple and often colloquial, the Fair Go is pervasive to the Australian lexicon and a feature of the projected national identity. The Fair Go has historically been used as a plea for fairness in contexts where there is perceived injustice. The Australian media hold significant power to shape public perceptions and debate, including those around fairness; however, there is a limited understanding as to how the Australian media use the term. Examining the use of the Fair Go by the Australian media allowed for greater understanding of the role that the Fair Go plays within Australian society. A media frame analysis was conducted to explore the Australian media’s use of the Fair Go, revealing that the Australian media imbued the Fair Go with complex power dynamics. Re-enforcing the Fair Go as a narrative of injustice, the Australian media used the Fair Go to both personalise and politicise experiences of disadvantage through dominant humanisation and responsibility narratives. The results demonstrate how the often used, yet simplistic, façade of the term masks the complexity and power that the media have imbued the Fair Go with. Furthermore, the findings raise questions surrounding the media’s use of the term and the legitimacy of the Fair Go as a moniker of injustice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashleigh Marie Pantaleo & Matthew James Phillips & Antonia Hendrick & Brian Bishop, 2025. "Australian Value or Political Rhetoric? The Media’s Use of the Fair Go in Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:198-:d:1619327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/4/198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:198-:d:1619327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.