Author
Listed:
- Sid P. Jordan
(School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA)
- Emily Thuma
(School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA 98195, USA)
- Aylaliyah Assefa Birru
(Sentencing Project, Center for the Study of Women, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 95817, USA)
- Deirdre Wilson
(Sentencing Project, Center for the Study of Women, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 95817, USA)
- Romarilyn Ralston
(Sentencing Project, Center for the Study of Women, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 95817, USA)
- Norma Cumpian
(Sentencing Project, Center for the Study of Women, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 95817, USA)
- Joseph Hankins
(Sentencing Project, Center for the Study of Women, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 95817, USA
Department of Anthropology and Program in Critical Gender Studies, University of California, San Diego, CA 95817, USA)
Abstract
The vast majority of people in U.S. women’s prisons are survivors of interpersonal violence, a pattern that organizers and advocates have referred to as the abuse-to-prison pipeline. This article critically examines criminal prosecution from the perspectives of survivors of interpersonal violence who faced long prison sentences in California. In-depth interviews and group discussions were generated through a participatory process at a gathering to launch the University of California Sentencing Project, a partnership with the community-based organization California Coalition for Women Prisoners. The twenty-two formerly incarcerated participants had collectively spent more than 300 years imprisoned. Drawing on their lived experiences spanning several decades and multiple jurisdictions, this article offers an unyielding account of tactics of isolation, intimidation, narrative manipulation, and confinement as definitional to prosecutorial practice and culture. This criminalized survivor-centered analysis of prosecution shows how one of the most robustly funded public interventions for interpersonal violence is not merely failing to protect victims but is protracting patterns of abuse and coercive control. Implications are discussed in terms of social care work and collective defense rooted in abolition feminism.
Suggested Citation
Sid P. Jordan & Emily Thuma & Aylaliyah Assefa Birru & Deirdre Wilson & Romarilyn Ralston & Norma Cumpian & Joseph Hankins, 2025.
"Disrupting the Abuse-Prison Nexus: The Gendered Violence of Prosecution and Abolitionist Feminist Approaches to Social Care Work,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:184-:d:1615205
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:184-:d:1615205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.