IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i2p112-d1592712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Low-Level’ Social Care Needs of Adults in Prison (LOSCIP): A Scoping Review of the UK Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Buck

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

  • Akash Ali

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

  • Noor Butt

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

  • Helen Chadwick

    (Research Institute for Disabled Consumers, London N1 9AB, UK)

  • Lee D. Mulligan

    (Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9P, UK)

  • Adam O’Neill

    (Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9P, UK)

  • Catherine Robinson

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

  • Jenny J. Shaw

    (Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9P, UK)

  • Andrew Shepherd

    (Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich M25 3BL, UK)

  • Josh Southworth

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

  • Kate Stalker

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

  • Katrina Forsyth

    (Social Care and Society, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

Abstract

In England, local authorities are responsible for providing social care in prison in accordance with the Care Act (implemented in 2015), but little is known about ‘low-level’ needs that do not meet eligibility criteria. These ‘low-level’ social care needs can greatly affect individuals living in prison with limited autonomy. This scoping review aimed to describe the nature, extent, and conceptualisation of ‘low-level’ social care in UK prisons, including prevention and promotion of independence. We adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Papers were screened by pairs of reviewers. In total, 31 papers were included. Findings are reported using descriptive techniques. Types of ‘low-level’ social care discussed included finances (n = 8 papers), feelings of safety (n = 8), and dignity (n = 8). Ten papers included prevention of social care needs and/or promoting independence in relation to social care needs. Evidence is limited, and further research is needed on ‘low-level’ support needs of people in prison. Consensus is needed on what constitutes ‘low-level’ social care needs; how they may vary depending on individual characteristics including age, gender, ethnicity, culture, and neurodiversity; and how individuals should be supported with these needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Buck & Akash Ali & Noor Butt & Helen Chadwick & Lee D. Mulligan & Adam O’Neill & Catherine Robinson & Jenny J. Shaw & Andrew Shepherd & Josh Southworth & Kate Stalker & Katrina Forsyth, 2025. "‘Low-Level’ Social Care Needs of Adults in Prison (LOSCIP): A Scoping Review of the UK Literature," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:112-:d:1592712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:112-:d:1592712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.