IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i2p108-d1590155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The COVID Shift: Comparing Hybrid Telehealth to In-Person Group Therapy for Incarcerated Women Survivors of Sexual Violence Victimization

Author

Listed:
  • Ana J. Bridges

    (Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Marley F. Fradley

    (Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Ayla R. Mapes

    (Department of Behavioral Health, Akron Children’s Hospital; Akron, OH 44308, USA)

  • Roselee J. Ledesma

    (University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA)

  • Emily L. Allen

    (Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Marie E. Karlsson

    (Centre for Sexology and Sexuality Studies, Malmö University; Nordenskiöldsgatan 1, 211 19 Malmö, Sweden)

  • Melissa J. Zielinski

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA)

Abstract

Incarcerated women report extremely high rates of lifetime sexual violence victimization. Survivors Healing from Abuse: Recovery through Exposure (SHARE) is an exposure-based group therapy specifically designed for incarcerated women survivors of sexual violence. SHARE has been continuously delivered in a women’s prison for more than 12 years. However, like many prisons during the COVID-19 pandemic, the prison ceased all in-person programming between March 2020 and July 2021. In response, the SHARE treatment team pivoted to a hybrid telehealth delivery model (i.e., group participants gathering in a facility group room and therapists joining via video, displayed on a computer screen within the group room). Given the lack of evidence for hybrid telehealth in carceral settings, and specifically for group therapy for sexual trauma, the current study compared ratings on internalizing symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory-18 or BSI-18), posttraumatic stress symptoms (Posttraumatic Checklist-5 or PCL-5), and group cohesion ratings (Inclusion of Self in Other scale, or IOS) for participants who received SHARE in person ( n = 21) or through hybrid telehealth ( n = 19). The results demonstrated that participants of in-person and hybrid telehealth SHARE groups reported similar significant reductions in BSI-18 (15.21 in person vs. 16.00 in hybrid telehealth) and PCL-5 (30.78 in person vs. 26.40 in hybrid telehealth) scores pre- to post-treatment and comparable IOS ratings (5.06 in person vs. 5.31 in hybrid telehealth). The findings suggest hybrid telehealth is an effective and feasible treatment modality for meeting the need for trauma-focused therapy in prisons. Future studies examining the effectiveness and implementation of trauma-focused hybrid telehealth groups in prisons are warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana J. Bridges & Marley F. Fradley & Ayla R. Mapes & Roselee J. Ledesma & Emily L. Allen & Marie E. Karlsson & Melissa J. Zielinski, 2025. "The COVID Shift: Comparing Hybrid Telehealth to In-Person Group Therapy for Incarcerated Women Survivors of Sexual Violence Victimization," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:108-:d:1590155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/2/108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:108-:d:1590155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.