Author
Listed:
- Isabel Miguel
(RISE-Health, Department of Psychology and Education, Universidade Portucalense Infante D. Henrique, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)
- Lénia Carvalhais
(Departament of Psychology and Education, Universidade Portucalense Infante D. Henrique, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
Life Quality Research Centre (CIEQV), Politécnico de Santarém, Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 279, 2001-964 Santarém, Portugal)
Abstract
Age discrimination is prevalent in society and has significant, far-reaching effects on individual distress. Additionally, loss of energy and fatigue are natural aspects of aging that can further potentiate psychological distress (depression, stress, and anxiety). Although the effects of ageism have been extensively studied, the moderating role of subjective vitality in the relationship between age discrimination and psychological distress has received far less attention. A total of 792 Portuguese participants from three distinct age groups (18–39, 40–59, and 60+) participated in this cross-sectional study. Data were collected through a structured self-report questionnaire, which included measures of perceived ageism, subjective vitality, stress, depression, and anxiety. Multivariate analyses of variance and moderated regression analyses were performed on the data. While an increased perception of positive ageism was found throughout the life cycle, results also indicated the highest levels of perceived negative ageism, anxiety, and depression among younger and older participants. Perceived ageism, both negative and positive, was positively connected to dimensions of psychological distress. Further, the effect of perceived negative ageism on stress and anxiety depends on the level of subjective vitality. The practical implications of the results to diminish the negative impacts of ageism are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Isabel Miguel & Lénia Carvalhais, 2025.
"The Impact of Perceived Ageism on Psychological Distress: Insights into the Role of Subjective Vitality,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:103-:d:1589094
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:103-:d:1589094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.