Author
Listed:
- Maria Irene Carvalho
(Department of Social Work and Social Policies, Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Institute of Social and Political Sciences—ISCSP, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Cristina Albuquerque
(Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences and Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Coimbra, 3000-186 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Pedro Borrego
(Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Institute of Social and Political Sciences—ISCSP, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Almerindo Lessa, 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal)
Abstract
This article intends to demonstrate the interconnections between exposure, engagement, human rights (HRs) lens, and methods in social work. To achieve these aims, we used HRXSW, HRESW, HRLSW, and HRMSW index scales to carry out a survey amongst Portuguese social workers. This survey was sent to 4079 registered members (100%) of the Portuguese professional association, of which 259 were valid responses (6.3%). The results of this pilot study show that professionals are exposed to HR in the education system and in the professional practice and that the level of engagement with HR is strong. Professionals revealed that social problems and rights violations played a prominent role during their practices with clients; however, contradictions are noticed in relation with intervention methods. Their methods are mostly informed by individual rights and personal empowerment, collaboration, and accountability and, to a lesser extent, by non-discrimination, micro and meso approach, and activism. We conclude that professionals have the knowledge and courage to consolidate and promote HR; however, in order to advocate for and promote structural social changes that lead to the full realization of an HR utopia, they need to use methods based on structural and collective approaches.
Suggested Citation
Maria Irene Carvalho & Cristina Albuquerque & Pedro Borrego, 2025.
"Social Work and Human Rights: Uncrossed Paths Between Exposure, Engagement, Lens, and Methods in Professional Practice,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:14-:d:1558530
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:14-:d:1558530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.