IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i7p360-d1429617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested Terrains: Mega-Event Securities and Everyday Practices of Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda De Lisio

    (Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada)

  • Michael Silk

    (Department of Sport & Event Management, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Philip Hubbard

    (Department of Geography, Kings College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK)

Abstract

Sport mega-events (SMEs) remake cities as global brandscapes of leisured consumption; reliant in part upon securitization designed to create an atmosphere free from disturbance and render invisible those “abject” populations who might puncture the tourist bubble that surrounds stadia and fan-zones. Yet, such “shiny” cityspaces are not devoid of complexity, contestation, and compunction. In this paper, we draw on extensive ethnographic- and community-based participatory research in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (prior to, during, and after two SMEs) collected in collaboration with sex workers, working in areas of SME intervention. Our focus is on the contingent nature of securitization amidst the contested terrains and trajectories of SME urbanism. Our analysis resonates with observations from other host cities, challenging dominant myths that the sport mega-event creates impermeable securitized cityscapes by revealing the fluid topography of formality and informality, contestation and negotiation, and oppression and power.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda De Lisio & Michael Silk & Philip Hubbard, 2024. "Contested Terrains: Mega-Event Securities and Everyday Practices of Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:360-:d:1429617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/7/360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/7/360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Betania Santos & Indianarae Siqueira & Cristiane Oliveira & Laura Murray & Thaddeus Blanchette & Carolina Bonomi & Ana Paula da Silva & Soraya Simões, 2020. "Sex Work, Essential Work: A Historical and (Necro)Political Analysis of Sex Work in Times of COVID-19 in Brazil," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:7:p:360-:d:1429617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.