Author
Listed:
- Junsheng Leslie Teo
(School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia)
- Stephen Richard Bird
(School of Health and Biostatistics, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia)
- Kerryn Butler-Henderson
(School of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences, Charles Stuart University, Bathurst 2678, Australia)
- Zhen Zheng
(School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne 3083, Australia)
Abstract
Physical inactivity among older adults is a major public health concern linked to various chronic conditions. Digitally delivered physical activity (PA) programs offer a promising solution to overcome traditional barriers. This scoping review aimed to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and engagement factors of these programs for older adults. A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase (OVID), and Scopus on 22 May 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria targeted older adults (≥60 years) engaged in healthy digital PA interventions. Data analysis was guided by the FAME Framework, TSQ, and the COM-B model. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 901 older adults. Most studies reported moderate to high adherence rates with programs being well-received. However, several implementation challenges were found, such as inadequate digital literacy, concerns regarding program quality, participant safety, and lack of perceived relevance. Despite these implementation challenges, they may be overcome using the TAM and UTAUT frameworks for technology acceptance and usage to address digital literacy, ensuring high-quality interactions and participant safety, and incorporating social support. Future interventions should leverage similar theoretical frameworks to enhance design and implementation.
Suggested Citation
Junsheng Leslie Teo & Stephen Richard Bird & Kerryn Butler-Henderson & Zhen Zheng, 2024.
"Scoping Review of Digitally Delivered Physical Activity and Exercise Programs for Older Adults,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:663-:d:1540551
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:663-:d:1540551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.