IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i12p652-d1533618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intervention with Women Victims of Gender-Based Violence: A Comparative Study on the Perception of Personal Well-Being in Burgos (Spain)

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Pérez de la Varga

    (Department of Education Science, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain)

  • Mara García Rodríguez

    (Department of Education Science, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain)

  • Mª Dolores Fernández Malanda

    (Department of Education Science, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain)

  • María Luisa Pérez Conde

    (Department of Education Science, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain)

Abstract

Choosing between the variety of existing intervention approaches in favor of victims of gender violence inhibits focusing on research concerning support for women to get out of violent situations, rebuild their lives, or minimize the consequences of violence. The aim of this paper is to collect information that allows the intervention to be adapted to the specific needs that women perceive they have, so that it has a positive impact on their lives and establishes through a response comparison whether the intervention has been really successful in terms of well-being parameters. The homeostatic theory of subjective well-being and the personal well-being index were used to evaluate the level of satisfaction that the participating women had with their lives at the beginning and end of the intervention, which results in an index of well-being in each person measured through the answer to questions that start from the generality. The main result of the intervention was the acquisition of skills by the women that allowed the valuation of what they have and the importance of not clinging to or idealizing certain things that can have a negative impact on other areas of well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Pérez de la Varga & Mara García Rodríguez & Mª Dolores Fernández Malanda & María Luisa Pérez Conde, 2024. "Intervention with Women Victims of Gender-Based Violence: A Comparative Study on the Perception of Personal Well-Being in Burgos (Spain)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:652-:d:1533618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/12/652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/12/652/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orose Leelakulthanit & Ralph Day, 1992. "Quality of life in Thailand," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 41-57, August.
    2. Mariano Rojas, 2004. "Well-being and the Complexity of Poverty: A Subjective Well-being Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2004-29, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khadija Shams & Alexander Kadow, 2023. "Subjective Well-Being, Health and Socio-Demographic Factors Related to COVID-19 Vaccination: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Sample Survey Study from 2021–2022 in Urban Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Muhammad Ibrahim & Sim Chung, 2003. "Quality of Life of Residents Living near Industrial Estates in Singapore," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 203-225, February.
    3. Želinský, Tomáš & Hudec, Oto & Mojsejová, Alena & Hricová, Silvia, 2021. "The effects of population density on subjective well-being: A case-study of Slovakia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Shao-Hsun Keng & Shin-Yi Wu, 2014. "Living Happily Ever After? The Effect of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance on the Happiness of the Elderly," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 783-808, August.
    5. Želinský, Tomáš & Soroková, Tatiana & Petríková, Daniela, 2018. "Economic Characteristics and Subjective Well-Being," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 334-364.
    6. Robert Stimson & Prem Chhetri & John Western, 2006. "Deriving Spatial Metropolitan Wide Patterns of Quality of Life Dimensions From Survey Data: the Case of the Brisbane-South East Queensland Region in Australia," ERSA conference papers ersa06p42, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Suxia Li & Meng Cai, 2024. "Social support and reference group: the dual action mechanism of the social network on subjective poverty," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Rojas, Mariano, 2008. "Experienced Poverty and Income Poverty in Mexico: A Subjective Well-Being Approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1078-1093, June.
    9. Monica Guillen-Royo & Jackeline Velazco & Laura Camfield, 2013. "Basic Needs and Wealth as Independent Determinants of Happiness: An Illustration from Thailand," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 517-536, January.
    10. Mariano Rojas, 2005. "A Conceptual-Referent Theory of Happiness: Heterogeneity and its Consequences," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 261-294, November.
    11. Ali Madanipour & Sabine Weck, 2015. "Social exclusion and poverty in Europe: Territorial patterns," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(7), pages 715-720, November.
    12. Jorge Guardiola & Teresa Garcia-Muñoz, 2009. "Subjective well-being and basic needs: Evidence from rural Guatemala," ThE Papers 09/03, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    13. Danish Wadud Alam & Amjad Amin, 2018. "Quality of Life and Well-Being Ranking of Selected Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 527-537, June.
    14. Sabine Weck & Isabel Ramos Lobato, 2015. "Social exclusion: Continuities and discontinuities in explaining local patterns," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(7), pages 765-782, November.
    15. Šarotar Žižek Simona & Vaner Martina & Potočnik Amna, 2012. "Employees Well-Being Based on Integrative and Innovative Model of Hrm," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 59(2), pages 231-250, December.
    16. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    17. Rojas, Mariano, 2012. "Do People in Income Poverty Use Their Income Efficiently? A Subjective Well-Being Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series 110, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Krittiya Kantachote & Nathakhun Wiroonsri, 2023. "Octa-Cluster: Different Perspectives on Quality of Life in Thailand," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    19. Mariano Rojas, 2008. "Intra-Household Arrangements and Health Satisfaction: Evidence from Mexico," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-57, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Khadija Shams & Alexander Kadow, 2023. "COVID-19 and Subjective Well-Being in Urban Pakistan in the Beginning of the Pandemic: A Socio-Economic Analysis," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 93-113, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:652-:d:1533618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.