IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i8p457-d1218349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Pseudo-Identification in the Post-Truth Era: Exploring Logical Fallacies in the Mainstream Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Vaccines

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Veselinovna Teneva

    (Department of Foreign Languages, Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg 199106, Russia)

Abstract

Because of China’s new wave of COVID-19 in May 2023, the issue of tackling COVID-19 misinformation remains relevant. Based on Lippmann’s theory of public opinion and agenda setting theory, this article aims to examine the concept of digital pseudo-identification as a type of logical fallacy that refers to supporting journalists’ opinions with ‘false’ arguments that lack factual evidence. To do so, the study applied computer-aided content analysis, as well as rhetorical and critical discourse analyses, to examine 400 articles related to four COVID-19 vaccines (‘Oxford-AstraZeneca’, ‘Pfizer-BioNTech’, ‘Sputnik V’ and ‘Sinovac’) published on the online versions of two major British and American mainstream media sources between August 2020 and December 2021. The results of the study show that journalists of the ‘The New York Times’ and ‘The Guardian’ used similar logical fallacies, including the opinions of pseudo-authorities and references to pseudo-statistics and stereotypes, which contributed to creating distorted representations of the COVID-19 vaccines and propagating online misinformation. The study also reveals political bias in both of the mainstream media sources, with relatively more positive coverage of the European vaccines than non-European vaccines. The findings have important implications for journalism and open up perspectives for further research on the concept of digital pseudo-identification in the humanities and social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Veselinovna Teneva, 2023. "Digital Pseudo-Identification in the Post-Truth Era: Exploring Logical Fallacies in the Mainstream Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Vaccines," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:457-:d:1218349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/8/457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/8/457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emilio Ferrara & Stefano Cresci & Luca Luceri, 2020. "Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of COVID-19," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 271-277, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez, 2023. "Vaccine (public) diplomacy: legitimacy narratives in the pandemic age," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 398-410, September.
    2. Khlystova, Olena & Kalyuzhnova, Yelena & Belitski, Maksim, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1192-1210.
    3. Federica Maria Magarini & Margherita Pinelli & Arianna Sinisi & Silvia Ferrari & Giovanna Laura De Fazio & Gian Maria Galeazzi, 2021. "Irrational Beliefs about COVID-19: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Sameera Horawalavithana & Ravindu Silva & Nipuna Weerasekara & N G Kin Wai & Mohamed Nabeel & Buddhini Abayaratna & Charitha Elvitigala & Primal Wijesekera & Adriana Iamnitchi, 2023. "Vaccination trials on hold: malicious and low credibility content on Twitter during the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine development," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 448-469, September.
    5. Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina & Cesar Villa-Collar & Clara Martinez-Perez & María Ibeth Peñaloza Barbosa & Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena, 2022. "Social Media Impact of Myopia Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Wen-zhong Shi & Fanxin Zeng & Anshu Zhang & Chengzhuo Tong & Xiaoqi Shen & Zhewei Liu & Zhicheng Shi, 2022. "Online public opinion during the first epidemic wave of COVID-19 in China based on Weibo data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:457-:d:1218349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.