IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i4p216-d1116531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparation of Two Participatory Social Housing Interventions in a Marginalised Roma Community in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Júlia Adorjáni

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Imola Antal

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Gabriella Tonk

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The first desegregation efforts in the marginalised and segregated communities in the Pata-Rât area were carried out within the frames of two social housing projects (between 2014–2017 and 2020–2023). Although a housing first methodology would have been more adequate in the context of a marginalised community, given the shortcomings of the Romanian social assistance system, implementation was impossible. In this context, it was necessary to develop a system to access social housing but also to create a reasonably ‘fair process’ at the community level. Thus, in both interventions, the starting point for developing the social housing criteria was to survey the community in order to explore the community members’ preferences regarding the criteria to be considered in the selection of the beneficiary families for the social houses. The surveys covered all the inhabitants of the Pata-Rât area, that is 219 households in the first survey and 282 households in the second. The survey results served as the basis for the development of the criteria for accessing social housing. In this article, we present and discuss the results of the community surveys from 2016 and from 2020, the year of the pandemic outbreak. Differences were found in the prioritisation of criteria, with an increasing preference for those reflecting vulnerability/needs (e.g., number of children, years spent in the community, disability) and decreasing preference for the ones indicating family resources (e.g., employment, income, education). These differences reflect the increase in poverty and loss of resources occurring in the community during this period, due both to the COVID-19 pandemic, and to the relocation of the 35 better-off families in the first Pata-Cluj project.

Suggested Citation

  • Júlia Adorjáni & Imola Antal & Gabriella Tonk, 2023. "Preparation of Two Participatory Social Housing Interventions in a Marginalised Roma Community in Romania," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:216-:d:1116531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/4/216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catalina-Ionela Rezeanu, 2015. "The social construction of Roma housing issue: determinants of Roma and Romanians perceptions," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 66-78, June.
    2. Peter Sika & Jarmila Vidová & Eva Rievajová, 2020. "Regional View on Housing of the Marginalized Roma Population in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Jaime Lara Lara & Fabian Mendez-Ramos, 2021. "Poverty vulnerability: The role of poverty lines in the post-pandemic era," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(4), pages 2690-2696.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janetta Nestorová Dická, 2021. "Demographic Changes in Slovak Roma Communities in the New Millennium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Gheorghe-Gavrilă Hognogi & Ana-Maria Pop & Alexandra-Camelia Marian-Potra, 2021. "Faces of Marginal Housing in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Koďousková, Hedvika & Bořuta, Dominik, 2022. "Energy poverty in Slovakia: Officially defined, but misrepresented in major policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Touhami Abdelkhalek & Dorothée Boccanfuso & Luc Savard, 2022. "Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Monetary Child Poverty in Morocco," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 15(3), pages 15-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:216-:d:1116531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.