IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i1p34-d1024809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intimate Partner Rape: A Review of Six Core Myths Surrounding Women’s Conduct and the Consequences of Intimate Partner Rape

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Lilley

    (School of Law, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7ND, UK)

  • Dominic Willmott

    (Division of Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy (CSSP), School of Social Science and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Dara Mojtahedi

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bolton, Bolton BL3 5AB, UK)

  • Danielle Labhardt

    (Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6GX, UK)

Abstract

The focus of this paper is to highlight and review the evidence surrounding common intimate partner rape (IPR) myths, their prevalence in society, and identify those who are most likely to endorse such beliefs. Six core IPR myths are discussed related to misconceptions surrounding (1) women’s decisions to remain in abusive relationships, (2) why women delay or never report IPR, (3) women’s perceived motivations when an IPR report is made, (4) a perceived lack of trauma that occurs as a consequence of this type of rape, (5) male sexual entitlement within intimate relationships, and (6) whether it is even possible to rape a marital partner. This article draws together a wealth of studies and research that evidence why such IPR myths are indeed factually inaccurate and examines how victims, justice professionals, police practitioners, and legal decision-makers endorsement of false beliefs pertaining to intimate partner rape serve to hinder various justice pathways. We discuss the consequences of rape mythology in so far as they create social barriers that prohibit the reporting of rape, impact the progression of an allegation through the criminal justice system and ultimately, obstruct rape victims’ access to justice. The review concludes by considering evidence regarding the possible benefits of education interventions in reducing the problematic influence of rape myths.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Lilley & Dominic Willmott & Dara Mojtahedi & Danielle Labhardt, 2023. "Intimate Partner Rape: A Review of Six Core Myths Surrounding Women’s Conduct and the Consequences of Intimate Partner Rape," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:34-:d:1024809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/34/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/1/34/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willmott, Dominic & Boduszek, Daniel & Debowska, Agata & Woodfield, Russell, 2018. "Introduction and validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS): An empirical investigation of the Story Model," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 26-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wager, Nadia M. & Goodson, Simon & Parton, Loren E., 2021. "A systematic review of experimental studies investigating attitudes towards sexual revictimization: Findings, ecological validity, and scientific rigor," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:34-:d:1024809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.