IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i10p567-d1257226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It’s Gone from More of Convenience to Necessity at This Point” Exploring Online Dating Use in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Thematic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nikki Dean Marshall

    (School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK)

  • Benjamin John Partridge

    (Department of Psychology (CEBSAP), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK)

  • Jade Mason

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Chanda Purba

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Amanda Sian

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Jessica Tanner

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Rosie Martin

    (Department of Psychology (CEBSAP), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK)

Abstract

There were reported increases in negative emotions such as boredom and loneliness during lockdown; simultaneously, there was a notable increase in new users and activity on online dating platforms (ODPs). While motivations for using ODPs vary widely, there is limited understanding for users’ motivations to engage with ODPs in a time when restrictions were in place. To explore users’ motivations and the impact COVID-19 had on their online dating experiences during the pandemic semi-structured interviews ( N = 12) were conducted in the UK during December 2020–July 2021. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Motivations for using ODPs during the pandemic included addressing negative emotions such as loneliness, but, crucially, they became a necessity for meeting new people and making romantic and non-romantic connections in a time of social isolation. Lockdowns had negative effects on creating and sustaining online connections; however, where online connections were made, lockdowns restricted contact through social distancing and tier systems, limiting the ability to progress a relationship by moving it offline. Online interactions provided a relationship building foundation; however, there was ultimately a need to move the interaction offline in order for the relationship to develop. Findings related to motivations fit with prior literature; however, there was a shift in priorities, with importance being placed on online spaces to meet social needs that were limited due to the pandemic. ODPs were important for society, they provided a space for connection and socialising, which was vital in helping people navigate the solitude of lockdown.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikki Dean Marshall & Benjamin John Partridge & Jade Mason & Chanda Purba & Amanda Sian & Jessica Tanner & Rosie Martin, 2023. "“It’s Gone from More of Convenience to Necessity at This Point” Exploring Online Dating Use in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Thematic Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:567-:d:1257226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/10/567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/10/567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyegyeong Son & Heeran J. Cho & Sunghwan Cho & Juhyun Ryu & Sunghee Kim, 2022. "The Moderating Effect of Social Support between Loneliness and Depression: Differences between the Young-Old and the Old-Old," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:567-:d:1257226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.