IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i8p366-d890567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“We Knew No One Else Had Our Back except Us”: Recommendations for Creating an Accountability Care Framework with Sex Workers in Eastern Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen C. Sitter

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Alison Grittner

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Mica R. Pabia

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Heather Jarvis

    (Independent Researcher, Halifax, NS B3K 5Z7, Canada)

Abstract

The authors report findings from a 15-month project that focused on the experiences of sex workers who live and work in an Eastern Canadian province. As part of a larger multi-phased study, 15 adults who identified as women, transgender, or non-binary, and received money or goods for sexual services, participated in photo-elicitation interviews. Drawing on a critical framing analysis, findings indicated supports—as identified and experienced by sex workers—encompassed three categories of care: self, community, and collective. These categories are described, with a particular focus on the latter two. Continuing with the care-based framework, recommendations to structure interventions draw on the role of accountability care in identifying how best to operationalize policies that promote health, well-being, and dignity of Canadian sex workers. The paper begins with a brief overview of the Canadian context and the role of supports. It follows with a discussion on the materials and methods and the results. It concludes with recommendations, limitations, and future considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen C. Sitter & Alison Grittner & Mica R. Pabia & Heather Jarvis, 2022. "“We Knew No One Else Had Our Back except Us”: Recommendations for Creating an Accountability Care Framework with Sex Workers in Eastern Canada," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:366-:d:890567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:366-:d:890567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.