IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i3p112-d766442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Makarychev

    (Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, Lossi 36, 51003 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Elizabeth Wishnick

    (Department of Political Science and Law, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA)

Abstract

Taiwan and Estonia are known as digital democracies facing threats from neighbors exploiting the vulnerabilities stemming from their degree of digitalization. Nevertheless, in their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan and Estonia have highlighted the strengths of digital democracy in combating a non-traditional security threat without employing the strong-arm tactics of authoritarian states. The goal of the article is to distinguish between vulnerability in cyberspace and digital power and put forward a conception of digital power to explain how Estonia and Taiwan were using their digital prowess to combat COVID-19. We argue that on one hand, their reliance on cybertechnology makes them particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks, but on the other their digital power enhances their global stature and domestic capacity to address threats such as COVID-19. The article starts by engaging with the ongoing academic debate on the concept of digital power and its political core. In the next section we adapt this concept to the policy practices of digital governance in Estonia and Taiwan. Lastly, we look more specifically at how investments in the IT sphere and e-governance were helpful for the two countries during the initial stage of the COVID-19 crisis. In conclusion, we highlight the paradox of two democracies choosing to extend the reach of the state into society through the use of digital tools to combat COVID-19. We further note that the pandemic provides a new biopolitical understanding of vulnerability and power in the digital realm.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Makarychev & Elizabeth Wishnick, 2022. "Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:112-:d:766442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sash Jayawardane & Joris Larik & Mahima Kaul, 2016. "Governing Cyberspace: Building Confidence, Capacity and Consensus," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(1), pages 66-68, February.
    2. Nazli Choucri & Stuart Madnick & Jeremy Ferwerda, 2014. "Institutions for Cyber Security: International Responses and Global Imperatives," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 96-121, April.
    3. Chelsey Slack, 2016. "Wired yet Disconnected: The Governance of International Cyber Relations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(1), pages 69-78, February.
    4. Jamie Collier, 2018. "Cyber Security Assemblages: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamic and Contested Nature of Security Provision," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 13-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Csenkey, Kristen & Bindel, Nina, 2021. "Post-Quantum Cryptographic Assemblages and the Governance of the Quantum Threat," SocArXiv 3ws6p, Center for Open Science.
    2. Eggenschwiler, Jacqueline, 2017. "Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11.
    3. Christopher Whyte, 2018. "Crossing the Digital Divide: Monism, Dualism and the Reason Collective Action is Critical for Cyber Theory Production," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 73-82.
    4. Tim Stevens, 2018. "Global Cybersecurity: New Directions in Theory and Methods," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-4.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:112-:d:766442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.