IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i11p526-d974858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Insider–Outsider Approach to Understanding the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in Pusiga in the Upper East Region of Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Benedict Ekow Ocran

    (Department of Social Work, Care and Community, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare St, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Godwin Agot Atiigah

    (Gbewaa College of Education, Pusiga-Bawku P.O. Box 157, Upper East Region, Ghana)

Abstract

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) as a form of gender-related violence continues to thrive within communities and across borders, with (under)reported prevalence among communities in the diaspora. Reports of FGM/C among communities in the diaspora speak to the socio-cultural and religious factors which promote its prevalence. Successful interventions offer alternatives such as rites of passage to the socio-cultural-religious prospects offered by FGM/C to practicing communities. This suggests the need for a critical approach to research methods that engage intimately with the worldview of communities practicing FGM/C while inferring implications for designing health-promotion interventions in specific contexts. This paper draws on the insider and outsider approach to positionality to assess the factors accounting for the prevalence of FGM/C in Pusiga (3.8% nationally and 27.8% in Pusiga) in the Upper East Region of Ghana while inferring lessons for designing health promotion interventions. Applying a phenomenological qualitative design guided by focus groups and interviews, we draw on the insider approach to present a contextually and culturally sensitive report of five survivors, five non-survivors, and ten religious leaders on factors that account for the prevalence of FGM/C. Next, we assume an outsider approach to infer implications based on participants’ perspectives for designing health promotion interventions to curb FGM/C. The findings suggest shifting from socio-cultural-religious factors to economic undertones underpinning FGM/C. Inter-generational differences also vary attitudes toward FGM/C. We recommend a systematic approach to health promotion that addresses FGM/C’s deep socio-cultural and economic, religious underpinnings of FGM/C in Pusiga. The insider–outsider continuum in feminist research provides a powerful approach to producing knowledge on contextual factors that account for FGM/C in particular settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedict Ekow Ocran & Godwin Agot Atiigah, 2022. "An Insider–Outsider Approach to Understanding the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in Pusiga in the Upper East Region of Ghana," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:526-:d:974858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Villani & Judith Louise Griffin & Patrick Bodenmann, 2016. "In Their Own Words: The Health and Sexuality of Immigrant Women with Infibulation Living in Switzerland," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Sanni Yaya & Bishwajit Ghose, 2018. "Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria: A Persisting Challenge for Women’s Rights," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedict Ocran & Sharon Talboys & Kimberley Shoaf, 2022. "Conflicting HIV/AIDS Sex Education Policies and Mixed Messaging among Educators and Students in the Lower Manya Krobo Municipality, Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:526-:d:974858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.