IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i3p96-d513322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Youth’s Physical Activity and Fitness from a Rural Environment of an Azores Island

Author

Listed:
  • João Pedro Gouveia

    (Department of Sports Sciences, Health and Exercise, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Edifício de Ciências do Desporto, Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Pedro Forte

    (Research Center in Sports, Health and Human Development, CIDESD, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
    Department of Sports, Douro Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Rua Vitorino da Costa, Nº 46, 4560-708 Penafiel, Portugal
    Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)

  • Eduarda Coelho

    (Department of Sports Sciences, Health and Exercise, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Edifício de Ciências do Desporto, Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
    Research Center in Sports, Health and Human Development, CIDESD, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize and compare physical activity (PA) and fitness levels by sex in 109 students of a rural environment. The participants were between 15 and 20 years old, from the Santa Maria High School in the Azores’ Santa Maria island. PA levels were assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-short form. The physical fitness was evaluated by the Fitnessgram battery tests. The sample of this study were physically active, 67.9% were classified with high and moderate PA levels. Regarding the sex comparisons, no significant differences between PA levels were founded. However, males presented higher values of vigorous physical activity, whereas females spent more time in moderate activity, such as walking. Moreover, females had more time in sitting positions during the week and weekend. Regarding the physical fitness levels, males presented significantly higher performances in the upper strength ( p < 0.001) and aerobic capacity tests ( p < 0.001), whereas females showed higher values in the sit and reach test ( p < 0.001), in the trunk lift test ( p < 0.005), and in the fat mass values ( p < 0.001). It seems reasonable to assume that there is a sociodemographic influence on the PA and physical fitness levels in our sample. We may speculate that rural life provides more opportunities for youth for being physically active than urban life. No differences were founded between sexes for physical activity. However, differences were found between sex for strength, flexibility, cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition. That might be explained by the biological differences and the type of physical activity habits that each sex use to have in rural environmental.

Suggested Citation

  • João Pedro Gouveia & Pedro Forte & Eduarda Coelho, 2021. "Youth’s Physical Activity and Fitness from a Rural Environment of an Azores Island," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:96-:d:513322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/3/96/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/3/96/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. TROANCA Dumitru, 2012. "The Impact Of Tourism Development On Urban Environment," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 7(3), pages 160-164, December.
    2. Bogdan-Constantin Ibănescu & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Alina Munteanu & Corneliu Iațu, 2018. "The Impact of Tourism on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Kaowen Grace Chang & Hungju Chien & Hungyao Cheng & Hsin-i Chen, 2018. "The Impacts of Tourism Development in Rural Indigenous Destinations: An Investigation of the Local Residents’ Perception Using Choice Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreea Gabriela Lazăr & Florin Valentin Leuciuc, 2021. "Study Concerning the Physical Fitness of Romanian Students and Its Effects on Their Health-Related Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamara Álvarez-Lorente & Francisco Entrena-Durán, 2021. "Potential for Sustainable Development in the Southeastern Spanish Region of Guadix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Abdullah Uslu & Emrullah Erul & José António C. Santos & Sanja Obradović & Margarida Custódio Santos, 2023. "Determinants of Residents’ Support for Sustainable Tourism Development: An Empirical Study in Midyat, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Cătălina Ancuța & Ioan Sebastian Jucu, 2023. "Sustainable Rural Development through Local Cultural Heritage Capitalization—Analyzing the Cultural Tourism Potential in Rural Romanian Areas: A Case Study of Hărman Commune of Brașov Region in Romani," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Tiberiu Iancu & Ionuț Laurențiu Petre & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu & Ana Ursu & Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru, 2022. "A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Mousa Pazhuhan (Panahandeh Khah) & Nabi Moradpour & Bahar Beishami & Rando Värnik & Yenny Katherine Parra-Acosta & Rytis Skominas & Maryam Pour & Hossein Azadi, 2023. "Do Inhabitants’ Perceptions Support Tourism Sustainability? The Case of Khorramabad in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Rebeca Guillén-Peñafiel & Ana María Hernández-Carretero & José-Manuel Sánchez-Martín, 2022. "Heritage Education as a Basis for Sustainable Development. The Case of Trujillo, Monfragüe National Park and Villuercas-Ibores-Jara Geopark (Extremadura, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Bogdan-Constantin Ibanescu & Mihail Eva & Alexandra Gheorghiu, 2020. "Questioning the Role of Tourism as an Engine for Resilience: The Role of Accessibility and Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Peterson K. Ozili, 2022. "Sustainability and Sustainable Development Research around the World," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 20(3 (Fall)), pages 259-293.
    9. Mulia, Edison & Meng, Ting & Florkowski, Wojciech J., 2022. "Ecotourism Service Provision and Incomes of Rural Households: The Case of Beijing in China," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2022(3).
    10. Víctor Jiménez & José-Manuel Sánchez & Juan-Ignacio Rengifo, 2019. "A New Residential Role for the Rural Environment in Extremadura, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Tolulope Osinubi & Ajayi Adedoyin & Osinubi Olufemi & Folorunsho Ajide, 2023. "Does Tourism Affect Sustainable Development in MINT Countries?," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 15(1), pages 72-92, January.
    12. Monica Maria Coroș & Donatella Privitera & Loredana Maria Păunescu & Adrian Nedelcu & Cristina Lupu & Alexandru Ganușceac, 2021. "Mărginimea Sibiului Tells Its Story: Sustainability, Cultural Heritage and Rural Tourism—A Supply-Side Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Andreea M. Crăciun & Ștefan Dezsi & Florin Pop & Pintea Cecilia, 2022. "Rural Tourism—Viable Alternatives for Preserving Local Specificity and Sustainable Socio-Economic Development: Case Study—“Valley of the Kings” (Gurghiului Valley, Mureș County, Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Pere Josep Pons-Vives & Mateu Morro-Ribot & Carles Mulet-Forteza & Oscar Valero, 2022. "An Application of Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators to Customer Classification in Hotels," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Cristina Lupu & Ana Isabel Rodrigues & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Martina G. Gallarza, 2020. "A Textual and Visual Analysis of the Intrinsic Value Dimensions of Romania: Towards a Sustainable Destination Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Chee Hua Chin & May Chiun Lo & Zaidi bin Razak & Pooria Pasbakhsh & Abang Azlan Mohamad, 2020. "Resources Confirmation for Tourism Destinations Marketing Efforts Using PLS-MGA: The Moderating Impact of Semirural and Rural Tourism Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Andrei-Florin Băbăț & Mirela Mazilu & Amalia Niță & Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Mihaela Grigore, 2023. "Tourism and Travel Competitiveness Index: From Theoretical Definition to Practical Analysis in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    18. András Donát Kovács & Péter Gulyás & Jenő Zsolt Farkas, 2021. "Tourism Perspectives in National Parks—A Hungarian Case Study from the Aspects of Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Kulczyk Sylwia & Woźniak Edyta, 2022. "Rural Tourism Opportunity Spectrum: Linking People and Landscape for Spatial Planning," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(2), pages 101-110, April.
    20. M. Isabel Diéguez-Castrillón & Ana Gueimonde-Canto & Nuria Rodríguez-López, 2022. "Sustainability indicators for tourism destinations: bibliometric analysis and proposed research agenda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11548-11575, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:96-:d:513322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.