IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2020i1p1-d466211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reactions of Prison Staff to the Needs of Culturally Different Convicts

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Urbanek

    (Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wrocław, 50-120 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

This article presents trends in penitentiary work with convicts of different cultures and focuses on their activation, individualization of work, and organizational difficulties. The purpose of this research was to discover the ways in which prison staff react to situations requiring flexibility justified by cultural differences of some inmates. The research questions included the following: How do prison staff respond to the needs of culturally different inmates? How do the respondents’ reactions correlate with professional experience? Based on the literature, a hypothesis was established that prison staff avoid individualized treatment of convicted foreigners. Despite the perceived differences in culture and religion, and their different mentality, prison procedures aim for uniformity. Tendencies towards resistance and stiffness to the needs of culturally different people become prevailing. The research method used included a diagnostic survey (n = 232, F: 40, M: 192) conducted with prison officers in Poland. A written interview technique was used, where the respondents reacted to 3 situations involving convicts, reflecting their national, religious, and cultural distinctiveness. In their responses, the respondents decided on their method of action in the situation as well as their motivation. Operationalization of the source material was performed in two ways. The content analysis method was applied according to the grounded theory (B.G. Glaser, A.L. Strauss), resulting in the creation of categories marking actions and motives. A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) of the built categories using the Statistica program as well as a correlation analysis of variables with Cramer’s V coefficient were carried out. The results of the analysis show statistically created, indicated manners of reacting that occurred in the studied sample. Additionally, they point out an independent variable—seniority—which correlated with the quality of the response.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Urbanek, 2020. "Reactions of Prison Staff to the Needs of Culturally Different Convicts," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:1-:d:466211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gallant & Emma Sherry & Matthew Nicholson, 2015. "Recreation or rehabilitation? Managing sport for development programs with prison populations," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 45-56, January.
    2. Gallant, David & Sherry, Emma & Nicholson, Matthew, 2015. "Recreation or rehabilitation? Managing sport for development programs with prison populations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 45-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gema Ortega Vila & Manuel Tomás Abad Robles & José Robles Rodríguez & Luis Javier Durán González & Jorge Franco Martín & Ana Concepción Jiménez Sánchez & Francisco Javier Giménez Fuentes-Guerra, 2020. "Analysis of a Sports-Educational Program in Prisons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Schulenkorf, Nico & Siefken, Katja, 2019. "Managing sport-for-development and healthy lifestyles: The sport-for-health model," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 96-107.
    3. Mark Norman, 2020. "Sport and Incarceration: Theoretical Considerations for Sport for Development Research," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 187-196.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:1-:d:466211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.