IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i7p103-d1419510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exposition of the Gap between Public Sector and Private Sector Participation in Green Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Chekani Nkwaira

    (Sustainable Living, Graduate School of Business Leadership (SBL), University of South Africa (UNISA), P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Huibrecht Margaretha Van der Poll

    (Sustainable Living, Graduate School of Business Leadership (SBL), University of South Africa (UNISA), P.O. Box 392, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

Abstract

Greening the environment cannot be achieved satisfactorily, considering that the private sector lags behind the public sector in participation levels. The purpose of this study was to determine the reasons behind the gap in green finance between the two sectors using numerically derived outcomes. Six-year data in the form of total shareholder returns, comprising capital gains and dividends paid from the largest banks in China, the USA, and Europe involved in financing fossil fuels, were extracted from Yahoo.com finance and Macrotrends public forums. Equity premiums were calculated from the total shareholder returns and risk-free rates. A 95% confidence interval was established to determine the lower and upper limits of the equity premiums. The resulting upper limits were used to project premiums that could attract the private sector by 2030. Equity premiums averaged 2.73%, 9.73%, and 4.31% for China, the USA, and Europe, respectively, indicating the substantial task in the USA of attracting the private sector compared to Europe and China. The projections of total shareholder returns showed the same patterns in equity premiums among China, the United States (USA), and Europe. To bridge the gap, the significant need for economic benefits for the private sector should ideally be addressed through green bonds, tailored to green financing projects that are earmarked for revenue generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chekani Nkwaira & Huibrecht Margaretha Van der Poll, 2024. "An Exposition of the Gap between Public Sector and Private Sector Participation in Green Finance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:7:p:103-:d:1419510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/7/103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/7/103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewa Dziwok & Johannes Jäger, 2021. "A Classification of Different Approaches to Green Finance and Green Monetary Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Peterson K. Ozili, 2022. "Green finance research around the world: a review of literature," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 56-75.
    3. Parvadavardini SOUNDARRAJAN & Nagarajan VIVEK, 2016. "Green finance for sustainable green economic growth in India," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(1), pages 35-44.
    4. Ozili, Peterson Kitakogelu, 2022. "Green finance research around the world: a review of literature," MPRA Paper 114899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Yanjin & Yang, Yuhan, 2024. "How Green finance affects export production quality: Fresh evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Maria V. Sigova & Igor K. Klyuchnikov & Oleg I. Klyuchnikov, 2024. "Sustainability and Security of Green Finance from the Multi-agent Games Perspective," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 78-95, February.
    3. Lu, Xunfa & Huang, Nan & Mo, Jianlei & Ye, Zhitao, 2023. "Dynamics of the return and volatility connectedness among green finance markets during the COVID-19 pandemic," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Tang, Xiaobo & Yao, Xingyuan & Dai, Ruyi & Wang, Qian, 2024. "Does green matter for crowdfunding? International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Ma, Hongmei, 2024. "Role of green innovation and green finance on green recovery: Analysis of natural resources rents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Carbune Daniela Iulia Maria, 2024. "Romanian Banking System - Steps To A Sustainable Future," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 206-214, June.
    7. Clara Paola Camargo-Díaz & Edwin Paipa-Sanabria & Julian Andres Zapata-Cortes & Yamileth Aguirre-Restrepo & Edgar Eduardo Quiñones-Bolaños, 2022. "A Review of Economic Incentives to Promote Decarbonization Alternatives in Maritime and Inland Waterway Transport Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Jing, Ruifeng & Liu, Ruizhi, 2024. "The impact of green finance on persistence of green innovation at firm-level: A moderating perspective based on environmental regulation intensity," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    9. Le Tran Ha Trang & Nguyen Thi Dieu Chi & Cao Thi Y Nhi & Dang Thi Thuy Hong, 2024. "Impact of green finance and environmental tax on sustainable development: Evidence from Vietnam," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10.
    10. Mertzanis, Charilaos, 2023. "FinTech finance and social-environmental performance around the world," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    11. Naima Lassoued & Imen Khanchel & Cyrine Khiari, 2024. "Pollution control bonds and overinvestment in utility companies: Does ownership matter?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 51(2), pages 517-539, June.
    12. Xuelian Li & Tinghui Lu & Jyh-Horng Lin, 2022. "Bank Interest Margin and Green Lending Policy under Sunflower Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Dr. Amolo Elvis Juma Amolo, PhD, 2024. "Green Financing for Sustainable Development in Infrastructure Projects in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(8), pages 420-426, August.
    14. Helmi, Mohamad Husam & Elsayed, Ahmed H. & Khalfaoui, Rabeh, 2024. "The impact of geopolitical risk on sustainable markets: A quantile-time-frequency analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Zhang, HongWei & Xie, Yuan, 2024. "Assessing natural resources, rebounding trends, digital economic structure and green recovery dynamics in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Mihaela Simionescu & Beáta Gavurová, 2023. "Pollution, income inequality and green finance in the new EU member states," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Bai, Rui & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Nexus between green finance development and green technological innovation: A potential way to achieve the renewable energy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    19. Catherine Marchewitz & Fernanda Ballesteros & Franziska Schütze & Nesrine Hadj Arab, 2024. "Sustainable Finance Taxonomies: Enabling the Transition towards Net Zero? A Transition Score for International Frameworks," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2083, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Zhang, Wei & Liu, Xuemeng & Zhao, Shikuan & Tang, Tian, 2024. "Does green finance agglomeration improve carbon emission performance in China? A perspective of spatial spillover," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:7:p:103-:d:1419510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.