IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v8y2019i1p21-d198468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mine Sited after Mine Activity: The Brownfields Methodology and Kuzbass Coal Mining Case

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Cehlár

    (Dean’s Office of the Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovak Republic)

  • Juraj Janočko

    (Dean’s Office of the Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovak Republic)

  • Zuzana Šimková

    (Dean’s Office of the Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovak Republic)

  • Tomas Pavlik

    (Dean’s Office of the Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Letná 9, 04200 Kosice, Slovak Republic)

  • Maxim Tyulenev

    (Open Pit Mining Department, Kuzbass State Technical University, Vesennyaya Street, 28, Kemerovo 650000, Russia)

  • Sergey Zhironkin

    (Engineer Basic Training School, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia
    Economy and Planning Department, Siberian Federal University, 79 Svobodny pr., 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia)

  • Magerram Gasanov

    (Engineer Basic Training School, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia)

Abstract

Operating life of a mine lasts from a few years to several decades. Mine closure occurs once the mineral resource is exhausted, or operations are no longer profitable. Mine closure plans are required by most regulatory agencies worldwide before a mining closure permission is granted, and must demonstrate that the site will not pose a threat to the environment and health of the society in future. The article describes a new tool, the brownfields methodology, which can help to promote the revitalization of old mining areas as a part of their technological modernization and subsoil full extraction with environmental damage reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Cehlár & Juraj Janočko & Zuzana Šimková & Tomas Pavlik & Maxim Tyulenev & Sergey Zhironkin & Magerram Gasanov, 2019. "Mine Sited after Mine Activity: The Brownfields Methodology and Kuzbass Coal Mining Case," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:21-:d:198468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spencer Banzhaf & Eleanor McCormick, 2007. "Moving Beyond Cleanup: Identifying the Crucibles of Environmental Gentrification," NCEE Working Paper Series 200702, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2007.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zbigniew Kasztelewicz & Mateusz Sikora & Maciej Zajączkowski, 2020. "Method of Selecting Opening Cut Location Using Multi-Criteria Analysis of Decision Variant Mapping," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    3. Henrieta Pavolová & Tomáš Bakalár & Alexander Tokarčík & Ľubica Kozáková & Tomáš Pastyrčák, 2021. "An Economic Analysis of Brownfield and Greenfield Industrial Parks Investment Projects: A Case Study of Eastern Slovakia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kahn, Matthew E. & Walsh, Randall, 2015. "Cities and the Environment," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 405-465, Elsevier.
    2. Marie Howland, 2007. "Employment Effects of Brownfield Redevelopment What Do We Know from the Literature?," NCEE Working Paper Series 200701, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2007.
    3. Brooks Depro & Christopher Timmins & Maggie O'Neil, 2015. "White Flight and Coming to the Nuisance: Can Residential Mobility Explain Environmental Injustice?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(3), pages 439-468.
    4. Kevin Haninger & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2017. "The Value of Brownfield Remediation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 197-241.
    5. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Randall P. Walsh, 2010. "Segregation and Tiebout Sorting: Investigating the Link between Investments in Public Goods and Neighborhood Tipping," NBER Working Papers 16057, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Karen A. Sullivan, 2017. "Brownfields Remediation: Impact on Local Residential Property Tax Revenue," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Lena Ali & Annegret Haase & Stefan Heiland, 2020. "Gentrification through Green Regeneration? Analyzing the Interaction between Inner-City Green Space Development and Neighborhood Change in the Context of Regrowth: The Case of Lene-Voigt-Park in Leipz," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Paul Thorsnes & Robert Alexander & David Kidson, 2015. "Low-income housing in high-amenity areas: Long-run effects on residential development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(2), pages 261-278, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:21-:d:198468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.