IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v6y2017i4p64-d118375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Wet Digestion Methods for Quantification of Metal Content in Electronic Scrap Material

Author

Listed:
  • Subhabrata Das

    (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore)

  • Yen-Peng Ting

    (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore)

Abstract

Recent advances in the electronics sector and the short life-span of electronic products have triggered an exponential increase in the generation of electronic waste (E-waste). Effective recycling of E-waste has thus become a serious solid waste management challenge. E-waste management technologies include pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and bioleaching. Determining the metal content of an E-waste sample is critical in evaluating the efficiency of a metal recovery method in E-waste recycling. However, E-waste is complex and of diverse origins. The lack of a standard digestion method for E-waste has resulted in difficulty in comparing the efficiencies of different metal recovery processes. In this study, several solid digestion protocols including American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)-D6357-11, United States Environment Protection Agency Solid Waste (US EPA SW) 846 Method 3050b, ultrasound-assisted, and microwave digestion methods were compared to determine the metal content (Ag, Al, Au, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Pd, Sn, and Zn) of electronic scrap materials (ESM) obtained from two different sources. The highest metal recovery (mg/g of ESM) was obtained using ASTM D6357-11 for most of the metals, which remained mainly bound to silicate fractions, while a microwave-assisted digestion protocol (MWD-2) was more effective in solubilizing Al, Pb, and Sn. The study highlights the need for a judicious selection of digestion protocol, and proposes steps for selecting an effective acid digestion method for ESM.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhabrata Das & Yen-Peng Ting, 2017. "Evaluation of Wet Digestion Methods for Quantification of Metal Content in Electronic Scrap Material," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:64-:d:118375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amit Kumar & Maria Holuszko, 2016. "Electronic Waste and Existing Processing Routes: A Canadian Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sigrid Kusch & Colin D. Hills, 2017. "The Link between e-Waste and GDP—New Insights from Data from the Pan-European Region," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:64-:d:118375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.